It is trying to deliver to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (invalid user) when [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a (valid user)
I believe that Klint may be looking into this issue
At 04:51 AM 28/05/2004, you wrote:
My server's getting bogged down with messages that appear to be looping via port 127.0.0.1. Here's a snippet from one that's been traveling around for days. Nothing strikes me as obviously wrong.
What to do or test?
Thank you,
Harry Jacobson
<lots of lines of "Received:" above here>
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (unverified [127.0.0.1]) by francis.parker.org
(SMTPRCV 0.48) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:16:07 -0500
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (unverified [127.0.0.1]) by francis.parker.org
(SMTPRCV 0.48) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:09:23 -0500
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (unverified [127.0.0.1]) by francis.parker.org
(SMTPRCV 0.48) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:02:56 -0500
Subject: Delivery failure
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:57:55 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 127.0.0.1/32
<as many lines of "X-Antirelay:" below here>
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Harry M. Jacobson
Technology Coordinator
Francis W. Parker Charter Essential School
49 Antietam Street
Devens, MA 01432
voice: (978)772-3293 x147
fax: (978)772-3295
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.parker.org
