Greg
I also got
the same reply when I check my
domain using dnsreport.com. Where do they get this date of 1 October
2004 from? I
have searched
RFC-Editor for the RFC on SPF and there isn’t one! The only thing I
can find is a set of draft proposals. Is someone jumping the gun?
David
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Baumgratz
Sent: 11
August 2004 16:34
To:
[email protected]
Subject: Re: SPF
Implementation
with IMS
Gordon,
I had read some of your previous postings regarding the subject - how
is the
progress? Just trying to strike up some constructive talks here to see
how things are progressing with newer mail filtering techniques. As
for
bringing up the SPF project, I am not really famililar with the project
or the
persons doing the work or biased in any way, I just happened to see in
a DNS
check at dnsreport.rom that the particular site was not registered with
SPF and
should probably do so by October of this year. I was just looking to
see
if something is headed toward a standard or popular trend...
Greg
Gordon Fecyk wrote:
Is anyone doing work on this (specifically Klint as he has
been handling
the SMTP receiver lately) to implement any such filters? Here's some
info for anyone interested: http://spf.pobox.com/ there is some
interesting reading there.
Bear in mind that I have strong opinions of SPF's "inventor," for reasons
noted elsewhere. However, the IETF working group called MARID's doing the
real, um, I guess you could call it work, which happens between the
bickering.
<http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/index.html>
Somewhere are references to the documents drafted so far.
