Greg

 

I also got the same reply when I check my domain using dnsreport.com.  Where do they get this date of 1 October 2004 from?  I have searched RFC-Editor for the RFC on SPF and there isn’t one!  The only thing I can find is a set of draft proposals.  Is someone jumping the gun?

 

David

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Baumgratz
Sent:
11 August 2004 16:34
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SPF Implementation with IMS

 

Gordon,

I had read some of your previous postings regarding the subject - how is the progress?  Just trying to strike up some constructive talks here to see how things are progressing with newer mail filtering techniques.  As for bringing up the SPF project, I am not really famililar with the project or the persons doing the work or biased in any way, I just happened to see in a DNS check at dnsreport.rom that the particular site was not registered with SPF and should probably do so by October of this year.  I was just looking to see if something is headed toward a standard or popular trend...

Greg



Gordon Fecyk wrote:

Is anyone doing work on this (specifically Klint as he has 
been handling 
the SMTP receiver lately) to implement any such filters?  Here's some 
info for anyone interested: http://spf.pobox.com/ there is some 
interesting reading there.
    
 
Bear in mind that I have strong opinions of SPF's "inventor," for reasons
noted elsewhere.  However, the IETF working group called MARID's doing the
real, um, I guess you could call it work, which happens between the
bickering.
 
<http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/index.html>
 
Somewhere are references to the documents drafted so far.
 
  




Reply via email to