Thanks for the clarification, Mike! > On 9. Apr 2017, at 00:15, Mike Milinkovich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 2017-04-08 4:02 PM, Kai Kreuzer wrote: >> I am luckily not in such a situation, but I think it is a valid question for >> which there should be an answer. > > There actually is an answer. Please see > https://eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process_2010.php#4_7_Committers_and_Contributors > > <https://eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process_2010.php#4_7_Committers_and_Contributors> > (emphasis added) > At times, Committers may become inactive for a variety of reasons. The > decision making process of the Project relies on active committers who > respond to discussions and vote in a constructive and timely manner. The > Project Leaders are responsible for ensuring the smooth operation of the > Project. A Committer who is disruptive, does not participate actively, or has > been inactive for an extended period may have his or her commit status > revoked by the Project Leaders. (Unless otherwise specified, "an extended > period" is defined as "no activity for more than six months".) > That said, I believe that a project leader removing a committer without their > consent is a rare occurrence. But I also believe that the development process > clearly states the roles, responsibilities, and process. > -- > Mike Milinkovich > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > +1.613.220.3223 (mobile) > _______________________________________________ > incubation mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________ incubation mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
