Ok, thank you. I will do like you said.

--
Rémi DRUILHE
Phone: +33 (0) 6 87 17 93 77

2017-04-19 15:30 GMT+02:00 Tyler Jewell <[email protected]>:

> I think we ask webmaster so that we can make sure things are tidy and
> organized.
>
>
> Tyler Jewell // CEO // tyler@​codenvy.​com // 978.884.5355
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Rémi Druilhe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thanks for the answers. Thus, I assume we will use multiple GIT
>> repositories. It will help us for the management of the subprojects.
>>
>> This lead me to my next question, according to
>> https://wiki.eclipse.org/Git#Creating_a_new_repository, we can ask for
>> others repositories or create a new one by ourself. I am able to connect to
>> the GIT server using SSH. Do I have the rights to create a new repository
>> or should I ask it to a webmaster? I haven't tried it yet because I don't
>> want to broke the Eclipse process with forbidden shell request.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Rémi DRUILHE
>> Phone: +33 (0) 6 87 17 93 77 <+33%206%2087%2017%2093%2077>
>>
>> 2017-04-19 14:38 GMT+02:00 Tyler Jewell <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> The Eclipse Che project spans 6 or 7 repositories now. We do it for a
>>> couple reasons:
>>> 1. Dependency management for assemblies that combine many pieces together
>>> 2. Size management for git cloning operations.  Specifically our
>>> customizations to Tomcat and our documentation are sizable.
>>> 3. Components that are part of the product, but release on a different
>>> cycle than the product.  For example, Che has a library of stacks which are
>>> Dockerfiles compiled into images and pushed onto DockerHub in an eclipse
>>> organization. These stacks are referenced by and loaded by Che, but we
>>> version and release them on a different timetable.
>>>
>>> Tyler
>>>
>>>
>>> Tyler Jewell // CEO // tyler@​codenvy.​com // 978.884.5355
>>> <(978)%20884-5355>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Ed Willink <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I don't think distinct technologies is a justification for distinct
>>>> repositories, however:
>>>>
>>>> When my projects moved to GIT, I wondered whether one large repo per
>>>> project was a good idea, or whether modules would improve performance. At
>>>> that time there was a strong recommendation for a single repository. A few
>>>> years later I see the time to clone an ever increasing GIT repo as
>>>> unwelcome and notice that some projects such as Xtext seem to be
>>>> refactoring. I suspect that multiple modules would be a good idea, but do
>>>> not have time/inclination to reorganise my own repos. Arguably CVS had each
>>>> file as a distinct module and so communication was much smaller.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Ed Willink
>>>> On 19/04/2017 09:15, Rémi Druilhe wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> We received the first commiters status on the newly created sensiNact
>>>> project. We sh=ould soon provide the initial contribution for IP review. We
>>>> just had a small meeting with the team and we have some questions.
>>>>
>>>> Our project is mainly composed of, at least, 2 larges subprojects,
>>>> i.e., a client and a server. Thus, we would like to know what is the better
>>>> way to proceed for the IP review. Should we submit the two subprojects or
>>>> should we do it incrementally (the server and then the client). I know
>>>> there is the parallel IP process
>>>> <https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Parallel_IP_Process>
>>>> we could ask for but I don't know if this is relevant for this case.
>>>>
>>>> To accelerate the IP review, we are not going to submit all the modules
>>>> in the initial contribution. It will also let us put in the right format
>>>> our existing code and still start the IP review process. Is a new module
>>>> (or in the future a new feature) must always be sent for IP review?
>>>> According to the Eclipse Legal Process
>>>> <https://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf>, we
>>>> could just submit a minimal set of code of the project (initial commit on
>>>> page 2) and then commit everything else using the normal process (page 1,
>>>> Figure 1).
>>>>
>>>> And the last question. We have at least 2 subprojects. We saw that it
>>>> is possible to create new repositories (cf.
>>>> https://wiki.eclipse.org/Git#Creating_a_new_repository). Can we ask
>>>> for others repositories to host subprojects (e.g., the client, the server,
>>>> etc.)? It will ease the project management because we are not using the
>>>> same technologies on the subprojects. Or should we request for a new
>>>> Eclipse project in order to have a separated GIT repository?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Best regards.
>>>> --
>>>> Rémi DRUILHE
>>>> Phone: +33 (0) 6 87 17 93 77 <+33%206%2087%2017%2093%2077>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> incubation mailing [email protected]
>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
>>>> from this list, visithttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>>  Virus-free.
>>>> www.avast.com
>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>> <#m_7262285859830480773_m_-6690652832600963903_m_1293976017159313200_m_3427375925841205274_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> incubation mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>>>> from this list, visit
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> incubation mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>>> from this list, visit
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> incubation mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>> from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> incubation mailing list
> [email protected]
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
>
>
_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation

Reply via email to