Hello Sharon, Thanks for the additional informations, it confirms some of our understanding of the process that was unclear.
Best regards. -- Rémi DRUILHE Phone: +33 (0) 6 87 17 93 77 2017-04-19 18:51 GMT+02:00 Sharon Corbett <[email protected]>: > Hello Rémi: > > > The IP Team will apply the Parallel IP [1] process to the initial > Contribution Questionnaire (CQ) in order to get the project up and running > as quickly as possible. That is our standard operating procedure. > > > > The Initial IP Request submission is intended to encompass all project > code that is being contributed to the project as part of project kickoff. > Should you not include certain modules at this time, you will not be able > to check them in until you request further IP review. We fully expect > project committers to continue to develop the codebase while the IP Team > completes full due diligence review. > > > > As you prepare your submission, the following may be helpful: > > > > * You may provide more than one attachment to the initial CQ in the order > to represent the structure of the content if you wish > > * Please adhere to the Eclipse Namespace Policy [2] > > * Please ensure the necessary copyright and license headers are in place > [3] > > * Do not include third party content with the project code CQ. Separate > third party CQs for the project’s third party dependencies [4] must be > filed separately. > > * All Third Party CQs will receive Type A IP Review (License > Compatibility Check) only during the onboarding process (again in order to > get the project up and running as quickly as possible) > > > > [1] https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/ > Parallel_IP_Process > > [2] https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/ > The_Eclipse_Code_Namespace_Policy > [3] https://eclipse.org/legal/copyrightandlicensenotice.php > [4] https://eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_ > Procedure_for_3rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf > > We hope this helps and we look forward to working with you and the > sensiNact project. > > > > Sharon Corbett > > IP Team > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:incubation-bounces@ > eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Rémi Druilhe > *Sent:* April-19-17 4:16 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [incubation] Questions related to the initial contribution > > > > Hello, > > > > We received the first commiters status on the newly created sensiNact > project. We sh=ould soon provide the initial contribution for IP review. We > just had a small meeting with the team and we have some questions. > > Our project is mainly composed of, at least, 2 larges subprojects, i.e., a > client and a server. Thus, we would like to know what is the better way to > proceed for the IP review. Should we submit the two subprojects or should > we do it incrementally (the server and then the client). I know there is > the parallel IP process > <https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Parallel_IP_Process> > we could ask for but I don't know if this is relevant for this case. > > > > To accelerate the IP review, we are not going to submit all the modules in > the initial contribution. It will also let us put in the right format our > existing code and still start the IP review process. Is a new module (or in > the future a new feature) must always be sent for IP review? According to > the Eclipse Legal Process > <https://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf>, we could > just submit a minimal set of code of the project (initial commit on page 2) > and then commit everything else using the normal process (page 1, Figure 1). > > And the last question. We have at least 2 subprojects. We saw that it is > possible to create new repositories (cf. https://wiki.eclipse.org/Git# > Creating_a_new_repository). Can we ask for others repositories to host > subprojects (e.g., the client, the server, etc.)? It will ease the project > management because we are not using the same technologies on the > subprojects. Or should we request for a new Eclipse project in order to > have a separated GIT repository? > > > > Thanks, > > Best regards. > > -- > Rémi DRUILHE > Phone: +33 (0) 6 87 17 93 77 <06%2087%2017%2093%2077> > > _______________________________________________ > incubation mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation > >
_______________________________________________ incubation mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
