Too bad Indiana degenerates into another Gnome distribution. On 7/10/07, Michael Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:51:20 -0700 > John Sonnenschein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [...] > > I understand that we want to eliminate some barriers to entry, but > > why ought we shovel rubbish in to the distribution to do so ? Not > [...] > > One wizards rubbish is another users necessary tool. Instead of > allowing our our situations to take over we should compare each thing > we are going to add or remove from the distribution against the > requirement set for Indiana. In this case I think sudo clearly fits > into the 3.3/FAM set of requirements. > > While the goal isn't to make something different from traditional > Solaris the reality is that is what will result. Thus some of the > decisions about what to include are going to be different. I don't > think adding a few new packages and reorganizing some defaults is going > to cut it. > > mph > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss >
-- Bruno _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
