Ken Mays wrote:
> Think of the distro market from the CentOS/Redhat and Ubuntu/Debian/Kubuntu 
> models. You can't technically leave out the Linux kernel and call your distro 
> a Linux kernel based distro - can you? Now a step up the ladder, CentOS is 
> Redhat-based. Kubuntu and Edubuntu are Ubuntu-based. All distros. So Indiana 
> can have distros based from it and at least developers will know they can 
> reuse packages between the distros (we hope). Doing it at the kernel level is 
> just not good enough anymore!
>
> ~K
>   

That's one thing.
But what I am referring to is this wording (posted to the advocacy list 
a day ago) :

Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> We are at a turning-point in the  OpenSolaris community, since it's 
> clear (to me at least) that our  initial assumption of a kernel-based 
> community with many external  distributions is no longer a good model. 
> This is not least because  (as Ian points out) it fails to deliver the 
> easy ability for there to  be a large pool of compatible applications.
>
> S.
>   

"is no longer a good model"  -  it sounds a bit hostile to the existing 
distro-communities, doesn't it?
Anyways in my understanding.
I instantly intervened, asked for a clarification, which I didn't get.
This sounds like closed corporate thinking and ruling.
Also, when a top-manager is talking about "in the  OpenSolaris 
community", what does he have in mind:

[ ]  a true motivation-driven community like over at Blastwave or Nextenda
[ ]  those individuals here who are truly willing to work on a distro 
such as Indiana, in their spare time, night and day, all the time 
offering to work, or already working on getting this or that stuff 
running, enthusiastically
[ ]  employees

Okay, my points are not convenient ones, are not welcome. Including my 
repeated offer to push SPARC_Indiana (to merge it with the SPARC-MartUX 
framework).
That makes me wonder, but I'll leave it there.
And I take it positively, that I finally have the time to fix important 
stuff: In the real world, where the laws of 
Input__generates--->>__Output are still valid, to some extent.

M.
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to