John Sonnenschein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I've mentioned numerous times before, it's not the particular
> implementation users are after, it's functionality.
>
> users don't want gnu tar per se, they want tar -z... or tar -j. We can
> have a standards compliant tar with the -z or -j options, and I'm sure
> ARC won't complain too much. wholesale replacing tar with gnu tar, on
> the other hand, they will ( and should ) have a fit over.
If you use star as TAR, you get this all together with standard compliance.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
