Dave Miner wrote: > Ghee Teo wrote: > >> Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 15:34 -0400, Dave Miner wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >> The recommendations are posted at: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/cd_recommendations/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I saw SUWNgnome-pilot and SUNWpilot-link are planed to be removed, but >>>>> they are run time dependency of SUNWevolution. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Sigh. At least they're small. Is there any reason they necessarily >>>> have to be dependencies of Evolution? In other words, is this a design >>>> dependency or merely the way we configure our build of Evolution? >>>> >>>> >>> Similarly, SUNWgnome-camera is a dependency of SUNWgnome-img-organizer >>> (because gthumb can also import photos from your camera via gphoto2). >>> >>> Removing gdesklets is fine, I think, they never worked for me anyway (; >>> >>> Need to verify how gtk+ links to cups. It has a cups printing backend >>> but it will probably work fine without it. Cc'ing Ghee to confirm. >>> >>> >> Unfortunately, removing libcups.so will cause the applications to >> exit when the GTK+ >> print dialog is brought up regardless of print system used at the time. >> So we can't remove >> SUNWcups without further engineering work. >> >> > > Can you estimate what portions of SUNWcups would need to be retained to > keep the print dialog functional? > My initial testing out showing that it needs libcups.so.* which is in SUNWcupsu to run Print Dialog in lp. Printing group owns this package and Norm is CCed.
-Ghee > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
