Calum Benson wrote: > > On 15 Aug 2008, at 15:15, Dave Miner wrote: > >> How big/hi-res are we talking about to need 72x72? It's a meg, after >> all. > > > Well, on my 24", 1920x1200, 96dpi display here, the 72x72 icons are (not > surprisingly) 3/4" wide and high[1]. That's bigger than our default > icon size, but they don't look huge on a 24" display by any means. I > can certainly imagine some people using that size for desktop or file > manager icons, on a 24" or 30" display. > > Of course, if we don't ship the 72x72 size, the 48x48s will just be > scaled up as required. So I agree it's not necessary to ship them, if > it helps-- I'd maybe have pushed a bit harder to include the 64x64s if > we had any of those, but we don't :) >
I took a look at Ubuntu. For Human, they ship up to 48x48 but also have an svg set. Dave _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
