On 6/23/07, Gary Gendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It saddens me to see what is going on in this mailing list. I was > looking for the banding together to allow OpenSolaris to become > something greater. The real issues aren't which WM, Email, or Browser is > the best. Rather I'd like to see how we are going to address the real > challenges of making it work on current generation machines and meet the > needs of a diverse user base. Instead I keep seeing how it should meet > the tunnel-vision of the few.
What you are seeing here is this discussion list degenerating into the same irrelevant drivel as opensolaris-discuss has. The one significant difference being that it took opensolaris-discuss at least a year to become irrelevant. I will let you be the judge as to why that is. Maybe this list would make some progress if certain prolific (and painfully irrelevant) posters -- you know whom you are -- would give this list a break, and would stop repeating the same tired drivel they have been repeating for the past two and a half years. I will postulate that all the readers of this list can understand a simple idea on first reading; it need not be repeated endless times. --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
