[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> PS: My experience is with SXCE (Solaris Express Community Edition) not >> Indiana on this hardware, and I find Indiana to be lacking in >> extensibility which this type of setup would most likely depend on. > > Could you provide more details on this lack of extensibility? > Certainly support for servers is more difficult today with Indiana > given the current lack of Jumpstart or something similar (but see > http://opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/auto_install/ for information > on what's coming). What do you find about SXCE that makes it better > for laptops like the MacBook? > > dsc UFS root is better than ZFS root with the current situation. Nevada is what Indiana is built upon and from my experience desktop support is still better (Fonts and other closed components are still very important). Text-mode installer. Offline install and live upgrade using isos. Probably others. Specific to the hardware, the ZFS boot issue is the main concern with dual-boot.
James _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
