I further confirmed my pictures from Forest Flora of Hyderabad State - by M
Sharfuddin Khan:
http://forest.ap.nic.in/Forest%20Flora%20of%20Andhra%20Pradesh/Flora%20by%20M%20Sharfuddin%20Khan/Botanical%20Names/Flacourtia%20ramontchi.htm(
*F. Ramontchi is syn. of F.india).*

2009/4/8 J.M. Garg <[email protected]>

> As per FFOS, *F.montana* flowers differ from *F.latifolia* flowers in its
> styles being distinct in the former compared to being absent in the later.
>
> 2009/4/8 Madhuri Pejaver <[email protected]>
>
>
>>
>> leaves in 2nd and 3rd photo look different
>> madhuri
>>
>> --- On Wed, 8/4/09, [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> > Subject: [indiantreepix:10424] Re: Fwd: Flacourtia latifolia or
>> Flacourtia  indica or other Flacourtia species
>> > To: "Dinesh Valke" <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: [email protected]
>> > Date: Wednesday, 8 April, 2009, 6:47 PM
>>  >
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >  It seems to be Flacourtia indica.
>> >
>> >      F.montana is common in the
>> > Borivali N.P. with 2 nice specimens seen at the C.E.C.
>> > It is a middle-sized to large tree with large [5-8cms]
>> > branched spines .It has large leaves glabrous and shiny
>> > above. Cherry-sized red to scarlet fruit usually occur in
>> > large bunches.
>> >      F.indica is commoner
>> > elsewhere including at Shahapur. It is a small tree with
>> > sharp naked spines sometimes branched at the bases of older
>> > stems. The leaves are small. The pea-sized fruit are purple
>> > when ripe.
>> >     Sending  a few photographs of
>> > F.indica taken at Shahapur.
>> >
>> > With regards,
>> >
>> > Neil Soares.
>> >
>> >
>> > --- On Wed, 4/8/09, Dinesh Valke
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>
>> > Subject: [indiantreepix:10412] Re: Fwd: Flacourtia
>> > latifolia or Flacourtia indica or other Flacourtia species
>> > To: "J.M. Garg" <[email protected]>,
>> > "oikos for ecological services"
>> > <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: "indiantreepix"
>> > <[email protected]>
>> > Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 9:11 AM
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Well I too am eager to know the differences :)
>> > ... OIKOS, please give some idea.
>> > Regards.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:51 AM,
>> > J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Can experts or other members throw some more light on
>> > this:
>> >
>> > "There was a confusion weather Satish ji's
>> > post was of Flacourtia indica or F.
>> > Montana (hardly any details on the net) vide
>> > Indiantreepix link:
>> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/453389554854ab18
>> > Shrikant ji's book only mentions Flacourtia
>> > latifolia (hardly any details on the net), which is
>> > stated to be occasional in deciduous forests in Hills. Trees
>> > of Delhi mentions only Flacourtia indica, which is
>> > stated to be common on the Ridge (I think Dry Rocky terrain)
>> > in Delhi.
>> > I am unable to differentiate between these two species.
>> > "
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
>> > Date: 2009/4/5
>> > Subject: Flacourtia latifolia or Flacourtia indica or other
>> > Flacourtia species
>> > To: indiantreepix <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Cc: Shrikant Ingalhalikar <[email protected]>,
>> > oikos for ecological services <[email protected]>,
>> > Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>,
>> > satish phadke <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 7/2/09 in AP Forest Academy in Hyderabad (I think
>> > Dry deciduous forest in a rocky terrain). There was a
>> > confusion weather Satish ji's post was of Flacourtia
>> > indica or F. Montana (hardly any details on
>> > the net) vide Indiantreepix link:
>> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/453389554854ab18
>> > Shrikant ji's book only mentions Flacourtia
>> > latifolia (hardly any details on the net), which is
>> > stated to be occasional in deciduous forests in
>> > Hills. Trees of Delhi mentions only Flacourtia
>> > indica, which is stated to be common on the Ridge
>> > (I think Dry Rocky terrain) in Delhi.
>> > I am unable to differentiate between these two
>> > species. Experts may pl. clarify.
>> > --
>> > With regards,
>> > J.M.Garg
>> > "We often ignore the beauty around us"
>> > Creating Awareness about Indian Flora & Fauna:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
>> > For learning about our trees & plants, please visit/
>> > join Google e-group (Indiantreepix)
>> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > With regards,
>> > J.M.Garg
>> > "We often ignore the beauty around us"
>> > Creating Awareness about Indian Flora & Fauna:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
>> > For learning about our trees & plants, please visit/
>> > join Google e-group (Indiantreepix)
>> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>      Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Grab now
>> http://in.promos.yahoo.com/address
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
> "We often ignore the beauty around us"
> Creating Awareness about Indian Flora & Fauna:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
> For learning about our trees & plants, please visit/ join Google e-group
> (Indiantreepix) http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en
>
>


-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg
"We often ignore the beauty around us"
Creating Awareness about Indian Flora & Fauna:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
For learning about our trees & plants, please visit/ join Google e-group
(Indiantreepix) http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"indiantreepix" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to