Thank you Garg Sir

I can only say that if presently any or both of *Limnophila cana* Griff.
and *Limnophila racemosa* Benth. is/are included in *Limnophila heterophylla
* (Roxb.) Benth. then only it can be the same.

You may find the following links, on *Limnophila racemosa* Benth. and
others, interesting -

   -
   
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=NtAaG2RDTGUC&pg=PA153&lpg=PA153&dq=limnophila+racemosa&source=bl&ots=GGSBro_AVL&sig=8Z7tPUchlFECuq-LD_scHw51OpI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hB4CUYSYNIesrAfalIHYCg&ved=0CEoQ6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q=limnophila%20racemosa&f=false
   -
   
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=gMwLwbUwtfkC&pg=PA795&lpg=PA795&dq=limnophila+racemosa&source=bl&ots=_AC0BcEWXL&sig=N9m6aT0YINUsQ-X4hrhJCITnv7w&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hB4CUYSYNIesrAfalIHYCg&ved=0CEcQ6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=limnophila%20racemosa&f=false
   -
   
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=fhN0VK2608QC&pg=PA208&lpg=PA208&dq=limnophila+racemosa&source=bl&ots=LNKofuEvlC&sig=ScKYOxW-R_TdUP2lbWIeLFoTHLQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hB4CUYSYNIesrAfalIHYCg&ved=0CCwQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=limnophila%20racemosa&f=false
   -
   
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=y4MEk-2tkV0C&pg=PA1246&lpg=PA1246&dq=limnophila+racemosa&source=bl&ots=zp9h9nVBLZ&sig=a7Fse6F1XWMPcfKVqdje_1lyLgU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hB4CUYSYNIesrAfalIHYCg&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAzgK#v=onepage&q=limnophila%20racemosa&f=false
   -
   
http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=D5A118669EC0468B51ADDDDCA561BF97?id=804352-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Bjsessionid%3DD5A118669EC0468B51ADDDDCA561BF97%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DLimnophila%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3D%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3D%26output_format%3Dnormal

On *L. cana* 
Griff.<http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=CE7FD498EBE1B80DD44733682395D275?id=804296-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Bjsessionid%3DCE7FD498EBE1B80DD44733682395D275%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DLimnophila%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3D%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3D%26output_format%3Dnormal>i
couldn't find anything in the net, except the description in Bengal
Plants and F. B. I.

Regards,

surajit




On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:57 AM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks, Surajit ji,
> I will correct it based on your feedback & of others subesequently, if any.
> Both are shown as unresolved names in the Plant List & not menmtioned in
> either GRIN or The efloras.
> http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2497702
> http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2498097
>
> We have also to find the current status of these names.
>
>
>
> On 25 January 2013 09:09, surajit koley <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Garg Sir,
>>
>> I find that this post has been placed under *Limnophila heterophylla*(Roxb.) 
>> Benth. of eFI site -
>> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/p/plantaginaceae/limnophila/limnophila-heterophylla
>> .
>>
>> I beg to differ, it cannot be *Limnophila heterophylla* (Roxb.) Benth.
>>
>>
>>    - the description of *Limnophila heterophylla* Benth. in F. B. I. can
>>    be found at -
>>    
>> http://ia700606.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=mobot21753000004357&itemPath=%2F23%2Fitems%2Fmobot21753000004357&server=ia700606.us.archive.org&page=n273_w1150.jpg
>>    .
>>    - the description of *Limnophila heterophylla* Benth. in "Bengal
>>    Plants" can be found at -
>>    
>> http://ia600604.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=mobot31753000237419&itemPath=%2F32%2Fitems%2Fmobot31753000237419&server=ia600604.us.archive.org&page=n104_w1150.jpg
>>    - relevant entry of *Limnophila heterophylla* Benth. in F. I. can be
>>    found at -
>>    
>> http://ia600607.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=mobot31753000967882&itemPath=%2F18%2Fitems%2Fmobot31753000967882&server=ia600607.us.archive.org&page=n102_w1150.jpg
>>  and
>>    it continues -
>>    
>> http://ia700607.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=mobot31753000967882&itemPath=%2F18%2Fitems%2Fmobot31753000967882&server=ia700607.us.archive.org&page=n103_w1150.jpg
>>
>>
>> I think either it is *Limnophila cana* Griff., as i suggested before, or
>> it is *Limnophila racemosa* Benth. (
>> http://plantillustrations.org/ILLUSTRATIONS_HD/61400.jpg, source -
>> http://plantillustrations.org/species.php?id_species=605445). The
>> problem with the later is that "Bengal Plants" mentioned, ".... pedicels
>> as long as or longer than 
>> calyx<https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/dr8_J99SGAM/discussion>....",
>> what is not found in the pictures in this post.
>>
>> As per "Bengal Plants" and "Flora of British India" *Limnophila
>> heterophylla* Benth. should have at least 4-nate leaves.
>>
>> Attaching one more photo for your kind perusal.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> surajit
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:32 AM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I agree Mayur ji- it was the same aquatic plant.
>>>
>>> On 16 January 2013 19:07, Mayur Nandikar <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes it is *Limnophilla heterophylla*
>>>> Garg ji, Might be you remember this plant is also we collected from
>>>> Jokha mashes with polymorphic leaves.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:15 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some earlier relevant feedback:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Page 762 and 763 of "Bengal Plants" describe *Limnophila*, the links
>>>>> are -
>>>>>
>>>>>    -
>>>>>    
>>>>> http://ia700604.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=mobot31753000237419&itemPath=%2F32%2Fitems%2Fmobot31753000237419&server=ia700604.us.archive.org&page=n103_w1150.jpg
>>>>>    -
>>>>>    
>>>>> http://ia600604.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=mobot31753000237419&itemPath=%2F32%2Fitems%2Fmobot31753000237419&server=ia600604.us.archive.org&page=n104_w1150.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> Could this be *Limnophila cana*?
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> surajit
>>>>>
>>>>>  I think L. heterophylla
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Giby
>>>>>
>>>>>  Thank you Giby Sir.
>>>>> Also received an earlier personal email suggesting ID as *L.
>>>>> heterophylla*, but -
>>>>>
>>>>> Description of *L. heterophylla* in 1) F. B. I. iv. 270. and 2)
>>>>> Bengal Plants ii. 763. informs :-
>>>>>
>>>>>    - stem always glabrous
>>>>>    - uppermost leaves (the 2 uppermost) usually opposite, ... the
>>>>>    next below 4-6 nately whorled pinnate, the lowest submerged long
>>>>>    capillaceo-multifid
>>>>>
>>>>> I think my species lacks the above features.
>>>>> Description of *L. heterophylla* in 
>>>>> FoC<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200020697>states
>>>>>  :-
>>>>>
>>>>>    - aerial stem with sessile glands or pilose or nearly smooth and
>>>>>    glabrous.....
>>>>>    - (in) rice-fields, brackish water....
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not sure if my species is pilose or hirsute, the later being a
>>>>> feature of *L. cana*
>>>>> *
>>>>> *There is a post of *L. heterophylla* in our group -
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/veCSBUpgrqw/discussion,
>>>>> but in *L. heterophylla* flowers are 
>>>>> sessile<https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/7Yl1XueaIf8/discussion>or
>>>>>  subsessile.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> surajit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: surajit koley <[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: 23 December 2012 23:13
>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:141206] Limnophila sp. Hooghly
>>>>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sir,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is *Limnophila* sp., found in a marsh beside railway-tracks,
>>>>> yesterday. It is still unclear to me which species of the "Bengal Plants"
>>>>> it might be :-
>>>>>
>>>>>    -
>>>>>    
>>>>> http://ia600604.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=mobot31753000237419&itemPath=%2F32%2Fitems%2Fmobot31753000237419&server=ia600604.us.archive.org&page=n103_w1150.jpg
>>>>>    -
>>>>>    
>>>>> http://ia600604.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=mobot31753000237419&itemPath=%2F32%2Fitems%2Fmobot31753000237419&server=ia600604.us.archive.org&page=n104_w1150.jpg
>>>>>    -
>>>>>    
>>>>> http://ia700604.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=mobot31753000237419&itemPath=%2F32%2Fitems%2Fmobot31753000237419&server=ia700604.us.archive.org&page=n105_w1150.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> surajit
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With regards,
>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
>>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand
>>>>> species* & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
>>>>> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise):
>>>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use
>>>>> them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image
>>>>> .
>>>>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian
>>>>> Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group:
>>>>> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 2030
>>>>> members & 1,42,000 messages on 31/12/12) or Efloraofindia website:
>>>>> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database
>>>>> of more than 7500 species).
>>>>>  Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds
>>>>> of India'.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mr. Mayur D. Nandikar,
>>>> Research Student,
>>>> Department of Botany,
>>>> Shivaji University,
>>>> Kolhapur.
>>>> 07507013607
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With regards,
>>> J.M.Garg
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species*& 
>>> eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged
>>> alphabetically & place-wise):
>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use
>>> them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
>>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian
>>> Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group:
>>> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 2030 members
>>> & 1,42,000 messages on 31/12/12) or Efloraofindia website:
>>> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database
>>> of more than 7500 species).
>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
>>> India'.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species*& 
> eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged
> alphabetically & place-wise):
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use
> them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group:
> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 2030 members &
> 1,42,000 messages on 31/12/12) or Efloraofindia website:
> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database
> of more than 7500 species).
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>

-- 



Reply via email to