Many thanks Gurcharan ji. Going further, (referring to Cooke's The Flora of the Presidency of Bombay<http://www.archive.org/stream/floraofpresidenc02cook#page/496/mode/2up>) want to know whether:
*Pupalia lappacea*, Moq. in DC. Prodr, v.13, part 2 (1849) p.331 would be treated same as *Pupalia lappacea* (L.) Juss. Intention of query is to know status of *Pupalia atropurpurea* Moq. in DC. Prodr, v.13, part 2 (1849) p.331. Regards. Dinesh On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes without any doubt. > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Dear friends, >> >> Please help in letting me know if these are two separate identities: >> *Pupalia lappacea* (L.) Juss. >> *Pupalia lappacea* (L.) DC. >> >> From my searches, *Pupalia lappacea* (L.) Juss. is certainly a valid >> name. >> >> Regards. >> Dinesh >> >> -- >> >> >> >> > > > > > --
