Thank you very very much Gurcharan ji for resolving the query and for the clarification too. Will go with *Pupalia atropurpurea* (Lam.) Moq. as synonym of *Pupalia lappacea* (L.) Juss.
(But sometimes I naively wonder at the science of taxonomy that two plants with different habits get merged as one identity !). Regards. Dinesh On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes Dinesh ji > P. lappacea Moq. ex DC is synonym as it is dated 1849 as against 1803 of > (L.) Juss. > P. atropurpurea (Lam) Moq., 1849 is also synonym according to both GRIN > and The Plant List (pl. don't get confused with it being regarded as > synonym of P. lappacea var. lappacea, and then treating latter as > unresolved. If P. lappacea is an accepted name, var. lappacea can't be > unresolved). > > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Many thanks Gurcharan ji. >> Going further, (referring to Cooke's The Flora of the Presidency of >> Bombay<http://www.archive.org/stream/floraofpresidenc02cook#page/496/mode/2up>) >> want to know whether: >> >> *Pupalia lappacea*, Moq. in DC. Prodr, v.13, part 2 (1849) p.331 >> would be treated same as *Pupalia lappacea* (L.) Juss. >> >> Intention of query is to know status of *Pupalia atropurpurea* Moq. in >> DC. Prodr, v.13, part 2 (1849) p.331. >> >> Regards. >> Dinesh >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Yes without any doubt. >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>> Retired Associate Professor >>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Dinesh Valke >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Dear friends, >>>> >>>> Please help in letting me know if these are two separate identities: >>>> *Pupalia lappacea* (L.) Juss. >>>> *Pupalia lappacea* (L.) DC. >>>> >>>> From my searches, *Pupalia lappacea* (L.) Juss. is certainly a valid >>>> name. >>>> >>>> Regards. >>>> Dinesh >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > --
