Garg ji You have  put my quote as quoted by Dr. Rakesh as my view for the 
draft. This was not what I commented on the draft. The is part of the 
coversation which started with Aparna ji's suggestion of library work. I have 
questioned in the discussion why the volumes of  'Wealth of India' are not 
online, this has not been put. I think you need to remove my name and quote as 
this was not part of the draft feedback I had given. I might do so separately, 
since I have not read it thoroughly yet.  
 
regards,
Rashida.



 



Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:19:41 +0530
Subject: [indiantreepix:19465] Combined suggestions on BSI/ZSI TF from 
Indiantreepix community
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]


Hi, Dr. Rawat ji & Dr. Madhav ji,
There has been lot of discussion on your report & also before this.
I am summarising only important aspects/ views for your kind perusal pl. so 
these are properly taken care of in your final report. 
Burning issue remains the creation of e-flora of India & use of advance modern 
tools like 'Indiantreepix' e-group for achieving different goals, from the 
Approach suggested in your draft.
 
1. From R. Vijayasankar, Systematic Botanist, National Herbarium of Medicinal 
Plants, Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions (FRLHT)
[Centre of Excellence for Medicinal Plants & Traditional Knowledge], 
Bangalore-560 064, Mobile: 9448970441
 
Respected Prof. Madhav Gadgil Ji & Dr. G.S. Rawat,
 
I wish to congratulate the Task Force team for preparing comprehensive 
recommendations for revitalization of BSI/ZSI. Thanks for circulating the draft 
report for public’s opinion. 
 
The recommendations are clear and complete. However, I (in fact thousands of 
botanists/ plant lovers) wish the following tasks to be given more emphasis as 
high priority tasks to be executed by BSI, with collaboration wherever possible:
 
1. An UPDATED ‘Checklist of Flowering Plants of India’ with ADEQUATE details 
should be published ONLINE without further delay.
 
2. Floras should also be published electronically (‘e-Flora of India’) and that 
should be comprehensive in nature and freely accessible to all. For this a 
dedicated task force, as also suggested by your team, should be set up with 
expert members from various institutions across the country, under the 
co-ordination/direction of BSI. To start with state/ regional e-Floras to be 
prepared/supported by BSI. These collectively can contribute for preparation of 
e-Flora of India.
 
3. A NATIONAL LEVEL electronic ‘Virtual Herbarium’ should be developed and 
REGULARLY updated. All Type specimens, in addition to others, of all Indian 
plants should be digitized and made accessible to the public.
 
4. Publication of the reputed ‘Bulletin of Botanical Survey of India’ should be 
regular and made ONLINE WITH FULL ACCESS. [Only electronic version of 
papers/articles to be accepted and hard prints (often several hard copies 
required by different journals) should NOT be accepted, as an effort towards 
conservation of trees and the environment (will other journals consider this 
too?)].
 
5. There are many Ph.D. theses/ reports on district floras and revisionary 
works remain unpublished. These should be carefully updated and published.
 
6. Lastly, but importantly, the threat status of native plant species that are 
facing serious threat of extinction (1000-1500 spp.?) should be QUICKLY 
assessed in order to identify the PRIORITY species that require IMMEDIATE 
conservation action.
 
2. Rajesh Sachdev, Moderator, Indiantreepix 
 
I fully support Vijayshankarji, specially on first two points which are much 
critical and have larger  importance as well.
 

3. From Dr. E S SANTHOSH KUMAR, Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute, 
Palode, Thiruvananthapuram-695562, Kerala, India
 
Kindly add my  suggestion  to the draft copy under the heading 
Capacity building: district level scientific community and barefoot taxonomists
 
Establishment of a few Systematic Gardens associated with major research 
institutes/botanic gardens will be beneficial to the students of botany and 
these will cater their need as a ‘living text book’ for  systematic study. 
Students/amateur botanist can be trained in these gardens.   
Many thanks
 


4. From J.M.Garg, Co-ordinator 'Indiantreepix' e-group
 
"Flora and Fauna of India 
 
The primary mandate of the BSI/ZSI is to document the plant/ animal resources 
of the country. Hence an important focus of their activity would be to complete 
the Flora/ Fauna of India. India has produced a large number of fine 
taxonomists, many of whom work outside BSI/ZSI, e.g., universities, research 
organizations and as emeritus scientists. Therefore, it is important  that 
BSI/ZSI now take on the role of coordinating and pooling the expertise of all 
the taxonomists including those working outside this organization to 
consolidate the Flora and Fauna of India volumes. This is particularly 
important because the local field biologists and experts who have spent a 
considerable amount of time in a particular geographical area can add 
tremendous information on habitat, associations, biogeography and population 
status. Floras/ Faunas written by the individuals having limited field 
knowledge, merely based on the museum/ herbarium specimens lack in such 
information. Coordinated work on Flora/ Fauna of India should also include all 
the works on various taxonomic groups done through AICOPTAX Project of MoEF. 
Such coordination would of course require a strong editorial board and a few 
full time dedicated executive secretaries. This should be achievable in 10 
years and should figure out as Priority I in BSI/ZSI’s Vision 2020 document.  
This could be achieved in the following phases:
i.        Establish a panel of experienced and active taxonomists for each 
state and take their consent on participation in Flora / Fauna Project, 
ii.        Prepare an annotated checklist of vascular plants and other taxa 
under consideration for each state / UTs based on all published documents and 
herbaria, giving local names, if any, locality and habitat,
iii.      Circulate the electronic version of checklists among the panel of 
botanists/ zoologists who would, in turn, check for omissions, ambiguities, 
localities and habitat through active consultation with other local botanists/ 
zoologists,
iv.     To begin with, state floras/ faunas should be published electronically 
giving correct names, basionyms, localities, habitat, sketches and photographs 
of important species preferably on an interactive ‘Flora/ Fauna of India Blog’. 
On this page all naturalists, photographers and biological artists should be 
encouraged to contribute information on taxonomy, distribution, natural 
history, biology, ethnobiology,  etc. This will also act as an outreach 
programme for all the biologists. The ethnobiological surveys should be done 
mainly by the local biologists, college and university teachers, working with 
local Biodiversity Management Committees under technical guidance by BSI/ZSI. 
v.      An editorial board may be constituted at the national level to decide 
the format of the flora/ fauna and also assign plant/ animal families for 
compilation which should include nomenclature, description, ecology, natural 
history, distribution, sketches and photographs."

I am not clear what it means by ‘Flora/ Fauna of India Blog’ & seek Madhav ji's 
guidance in the matter particularly w.r.t the word Blog. Also it is not clear 
whether it will be accessible to all or not. I think any restriction on its 
access as far as its contents are concerned, should go away in view of the 
'Approach' followed  in the paper (as subsequently highlighted). While it is 
encouraging to see " To begin with, state floras/ faunas should be published 
electronically giving correct names, basionyms, localities, habitat, sketches 
and photographs of important species preferably on an interactive ‘Flora/ Fauna 
of India Blog’. " in the draft, there is hardly anything which talks of 
creating e-flora of India on the lines of e-flora of China & other neighbouring 
countries. I feel  'AICOPTAX Project' of MoEF should be sufficiently 
strengthened with a mandate for simultaneously creating of e-Flora/ e-Fauna of 
India on lines of e-Floras of different countries of the world. How to go about 
creating e-floras is evident at link: 
http://flora.huh.harvard.edu/china/PDF/misc/eFloras_Taxon_55_188-192_2006.pdf

This becomes all the more important as the report in its 'Approach' rightly 
talks of "......Finally, the culmination of evolution of artifacts to the 
present day Information and Communication Technology has brought us to the 
threshold of a tenth major transition: x] Language based human societies –to- 
Human societies with global access to the entire stock of human knowledge, and 
engaged in an endeavour of collaborative knowledge generation." This approach 
will remain an illusion until & unless we are able to create e-Flora/ e-Fauna 
of India which is accessible to all human community & appear in top 10 while 
searching as far as 'Indian species' are concerned. The need of the hour is to 
move fast in this regard, if India is to be visible on the world map. It is 
said that we have to refer to 'e-Flora of China', 'e-Flora of Pakistan' etc. 
when we search on net for information about any Indian plant species.We hardly 
find any inf. on search in our "......national networks like DBT’s India 
Biodiversity Information Network (IBIN) and NBA’s India Biodiversity 
Information System (IBIS)." as talked about in the report.
 
Further if the dreams of its 'Approach'  "......Finally, the culmination of 
evolution of artifacts to the present day Information and Communication 
Technology has brought us to the threshold of a tenth major transition: x] 
Language based human societies –to- Human societies with global access to the 
entire stock of human knowledge, and engaged in an endeavour of collaborative 
knowledge generation." are to be fulfilled in this e-age, it has to speak 
loudly about increasing participation & expertise in on-line community 
activities like those of 'Indiantreepix' google e-group, regarding which it is 
totally silent. Here information is shared on real time basis for the benefit 
of all stakeholders, minimising delays & fastening processes, following 
multi-disciplinary approach with membership from diverse background. This 
should also help in the process of constant learning in ones' career & creating 
passionate scientists/ taxonomists aided/ guided by other willing scientists/ 
taxonomists. This should also help in "Capacity building: scientists" & 
"Capacity building: district level scientific community and barefoot 
taxonomists under "7)Human Resources" 
 
5. From Dr. Gurcharan Singh, Associate Professor, Department of Botany, SGTB 
Khalsa College
University of Delhi, Delhi-110007:
 
I strongly feel that the vast information lying in hard covers of BSI/ZSI 
journals, publications, Fascicles of Flora of India, Flora of India volumes, 
has to come out on the internet so that we may not fend for information and 
identification, the Efloras of Pakistan, China, North America, etc. There is 
need for compilation of this information, and I feel there are numerous experts 
even outside BSI and ZSI who can collaborate. Our Eflora could be much more 
meaningful with links to authentic identified photographs of plants from India. 
We have huge databases of photographs on Indiantreepix, Flowers of India and 
several similar privately managed sites, which can be requested to collaborate 
and share their data.
     For ongoing research on Indian plants it is imperative have have our 
herbarium specimens (at least representative ones) and type specimens are 
scanned/photographed and uploaded as virtual herbarium  in lines of Fairchild 
virtual herbarium, Kew virtual herbarium, Australian Virtual herbarium and 
Virtual herbarium of New York Botanical Garden. 
    We have to open up if Indian research has to progress
 
6. From Sh. Prashant Awale, Moderator 'Indiantreepix':
 
I agree with the Dr Singh ji's view. Also, their has to be some mechanism to 
get in touch with experts from BSI so that we can share our experiences on 
flora of a particular region with them and it might turned out to be totally 
new finding. Many of us are frequently visiting various remote locations and 
information gathered on flora from these areas might turned out to be of some 
use to BSI. Some mechanism where by individuals / group can interact with BSI 
should be available.
Already database like those of "Flowers of India" , "IndianTreePix" has come 
long way (Thanks to initiave by Mr Tabish Ji, Mr Garg Ji) as more and more 
enthusiastics from various field (Botanists, Nature lovers, Trekkers etc..) has 
contributed in some way or other.
 
7. Dr. Aparna Watve:
 
Dear All,
Considering all the serious discussions going on so far on various identities, 
use of family names, I am so happy to realize how thisgroup is slowly maturing. 
People are discussing technical terms, use of correct family names, below 
species ranks and nomenclature- things which only the trained plant taxonomists 
bothered with. Owing to this I feel the need to talk about more use of standard 
floras and monographs which i had talked of in the past. Relying only on 
handbooks, which are generally region specific and can have only a limited 
number of species and descriptions as compared to our vast diversity of flora, 
is good for beginners. But at this stage, the serious ones on this group - and 
there are many- should devote time to library and referencing work- not from a 
single book (as it is not possible) but from various standard references and 
then form their
opinion on identity of a species. In many cases the taxonomic literature is 
also influenced by varied opinions of the taxonomists and it is actually fun to 
read how some plant species have baffled generations of plantwatchers.
 
8. Dr. Gurcharan Singh:
 
Aparna ji,
You have initiated a very valuable topic for the sake of our group and the 
National Flora. While there is need for nomenclatural and identity uniformity 
at India level and regional level, unfortunately very little has recently been 
done at national level, some very good regional publications have come up for 
us to bank upon, discuss and arrive at a meaningful conclusion. Science today 
is dynamic process, and it does not take a minute for new information to reach 
www, for all of us to benefit from. It needs a lot of time for a national 
compilation to come up.
 
     But then there is a catch. There is also lot of wrong information flying 
around on the internet, but with so many able minded and sincere people around, 
we can (and have been) sieve the right information.
 

9. Janaki Turaga, member 'Indiantreepix'
 
Dear Aparna,
For a majority of people: it is the question of access. From where does one 
have access to all these monographs, of which many of us are not even aware of?
Unless someone lists all the monographs and other related works and puts them 
up for access on the internet which is accessible to all the people in the 
group.
In absence of accessible knowledge, the key source of information are the 
fieldguides which are accessible in the lay public domain.
And some internet sites which are maintained by people who are deeply 
interested in the areas.
Interest groups like this group rely mainly on fieldguides, some good internet 
sites and very importantly-peers who have built their interest to a very high 
level and some professionals/subject specialists who sustain the group. I have 
learnt a lot from the peers in all the groups that I am a member of.
We all would like to take things ahead, but we should have the awareness of and 
access to these resource. 
The issue is that of access and knowledge of the monographs etc.
If some of the subject specialists in this group who do have access to these 
resources, can make them available to the rest of the group, then I feel a 
majority of people will benefit.
Janaki Turaga
 
10. Dr. Rakesh Biswas:
 
Quoting Rashida:
 
serious reference work one should do in a  library. I feel no amount of links 
and material available on the internet can really at this stage, substitute the 
research work one needs to carry out from acknowledged authors, volumes of 
flora of a state or region, wealth of India volumes, and related articals in 
magazines and scientifc journals. 
I wonder if the problem could be simply solved by transferring all the 
libraries into a web space as most web based user driven learning activists are 
engaged in doing?
 
Quoting from the first chapter in this book (which also contains a subsequent 
chapter contributed by members of Indiantreepix):
http://www.igi-global.com/requests/details.asp?ID=657
 
Traditionally libraries have been considered as temples of learning and an 
important requirement for a library user is ‘silence’ which in effect means 
that the individual user needs to imbibe whatever learning available on his/her 
own from books or whatever other media available. 
 
However in such an isolated learning environment, the single individual
has no access to a second opinion from another person, no access to a 
complementary perspective, or external critique, neither does the single 
individual have any chance to get complementary literature from anyone which 
might have a different reference library. Given this, there is not much social 
interaction in this kind of traditional learning environment. (Wiberg 2007)
 
However in modern libraries it is able to break past this ‘silence’ barrier 
where the library user predominantly browses an electronic information network 
rather than a paper based disconnected media.
 
Unfortunately, this advantage of the modern library is under utilized as even 
systems for online universities, or distance education may not have adequate 
support or encouragement for social interaction. Most of these systems assume a 
centralized communication model in which the learning peers (i.e. the students) 
mostly communicate with one central peer (i.e. a mentor or advisor). This leads 
in many cases to communication related to the structure rather than the content 
of an online education and does not support spontaneous, creative social 
learning processes. (Wiberg 2007)
 
What it is to be knowledgeable can be defined either in terms of how much one 
person has read and learned in isolation, or how knowledgeable a particular 
person is about different threads to grasp in order to gain access to other 
peers in different social networks. The latter concept pinpoints the social 
dimension of learning processes, the social interaction setting, and goes back 
to a Socratic understanding of knowledge gaining through conversations and 
argumentations with others.
  
Learning schools are redirecting the focus from what has been labeled 
“traditional computer-based learning environments” towards user-driven learning 
networks supported by social internet based applications. The assumption that 
computer-mediated learning will occur in the classroom, managed by a teacher, 
is now being challenged, not by schools and educational software developers, 
but by the consumer growth of personal technologies. (Sharples 2002)
 
11. Dr. Gurcharan Singh:
 
The main topic of discussion here is whether the huge wealth of research 
information lying in libraries of major Universities, BSI/ZSI is available to 
the average plant lover are not. Agreed serious researchers need libraries to 
work, but we are talking of taking knowledge to the general public and what is 
the best means of making information available to them. I have several volumes 
of Flora of Pakistan, a few of Flora of India, but please search through your 
libraries and let me know how many have all volumes of Flora of India published 
by BSI, how many have volumes Pakistan Flora, and more importantly Flora of 
China, which has so many plants common with our flora. Contrary to this I can 
sitting in Delhi, California or anywhere else have access to Efloras, and can 
identify my plants. 
We are aiming to take information to the common man, and www is the best medium 
for that.
But as I wrote earlier, there is some misinformation on the internet, but there 
are then also meanins of sieving it. This group has proved that many a times.
There are many important researchers active in BSI/ZSI and different 
Universities. But the important question is have we all benefitted from that?. 
WWW is there to pupularise that. Today if I have to find any new research and 
development in Taxonomy I browse APWeb and always find something new. 
-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg ([email protected])
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
Image Resource of thousands of my images of Birds, Butterflies, Flora etc. 
(arranged alphabetically & place-wise): 
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg
For learning about Indian Flora, visit/ join Google e-group- 
Indiantreepix:http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en



                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Live Search extreme As India feels the heat of poll season, get all the info 
you need on the MSN News Aggregator
http://news.in.msn.com/National/indiaelections2009/aggregator/default.aspx
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"indiantreepix" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to