Sir,

This plant is known as BIBI KUMRA locallly. I forgot to mention that we
also eat its flower (male) fried with gram-flour.
After much thought I think it is *C. moschata* Duchesne as you have already
identified in your book or in eFI.

Spathulate sepals (however variable it may be), pentagonal peduncle with
broad/expanded attachment should precede any other discrepancies in leaf or
hair characteristics.

Thank you very much for this very educative discussion.

Regards,

surajit


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> We also used to cultivate the vine in Kashmir. I don't remember the fruit,
> but flowers were large and yellow, C. pepo or C. moschata. Our mother used
> to cook flowers buds and young shoots as karhi (using curd but withour gram
> flour) it used to be very tasty. She would make halwa for us from fruits,
> but at that age (8-10 years), pepo or moschata had no meaning for us.
>
>
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:45 PM, surajit koley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sir,
>>
>> The more i read the more it gets complicated to conclude. I surely would
>> follow the plants in my home. We eat its leaf as SHAG/SHAK (significantly
>> rough & bland tasted compared to Indian spinach) and the fruits as
>> vegetable. We do not prepare any pumpkin-HALWA and the same can be said
>> about my friends/neighbour.
>>
>> Meanwhile, it has grooved/sulcate peduncle of *pepo* (Hooker & Haines),
>> prickly (*pepo*, Hooker), but, 1) leaves are not deeply five-lobed
>> (Prain) 2) problem of sepal, 3) doubt over if petiole can be called pungent
>> (*pepo*, Prain).
>>
>> Herbarium in the net is not helpul -
>>
>>    1.
>>    
>> http://linnean-online.org/view/collection/linnean=5Fherbarium/Cucurbita.html
>>    2. http://florida.plantatlas.usf.edu/SpecimenDetails.aspx?PlantID=428
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> surajit
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Please follow them till maturity to resolve. Here in Delhi there are two
>>> types of fruits sold in the market. Those looking similar to yours sold as
>>> petha (most commonly) or kadu  or safed kadu (some as Sita phal) and cooked
>>> as vegetable. These are globose, dark green with white lines or patches,
>>> almost flat or depressed top. The second is sold almost yellow in colour
>>> (second photograph in my book), elongated, almost oblong and up to 80 cm
>>> long, mostly sold as Sita phal, cooked as vegetable but more commonly as
>>> sweet halwa. Inititially I had thought them to be two different species,
>>> former as C. pepo and latter as C. moschata, but latter changed my mind
>>> after seeing wide range of fruits in the market and images of ayote squash
>>> on the net and its description in Vegetable crops by Balakrishnan.
>>>    As I wrote earlier may be you will be able to give me a clear picture
>>> after studying your vines in detail and following up fruits till maturity.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:14 PM, surajit koley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sir,
>>>>
>>>> There are three vines growing in our home. From ground they climb to
>>>> the roof of our store room as can be seen in the newly attached first pic.
>>>> There. on the roof, they remain prostrate. They are intertwined so closely,
>>>> firmly gripping each other with their tendrils, it is hard to separate them
>>>> and follow individually.
>>>>
>>>> Yet, i rechecked thoroughly this afternoon. All bearing -
>>>>
>>>>    - same leaves, no white patch on any, petiole prickly
>>>>    - mature stem of all very prickly
>>>>    - leaf upper surface very scabrous, lower surface hairy, but not
>>>>    scabrous
>>>>    - two plants bear fruit; fruits are same, peduncle grooved,
>>>>    somewhat woody (not sure, maybe corky instead)
>>>>
>>>> As for *sepals* it is the most confusing part. Of all the flowers i
>>>> have examined only 3 or 4 have somewhat foliaceous sepals at the tip. But,
>>>> this foliaceous part is variable (pic xx399 in this latest record), one
>>>> having distinct while another is narrow wing like along the linear sepal.
>>>>
>>>> Surely *the fruits can be said xerox copies of your photograph in page
>>>> 53 of your book. Also the leaves in page 51.*
>>>> *Also, it can be said that my plant(s), except for sepal confusion, is
>>>> a copy of the illustration in FoC
>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=119692&flora_id=2>.*
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand all the three plants certainly oppose the record of *C.
>>>> moschata* by Dr. Haines, "The species is easily recognised by its
>>>> general softness,.."
>>>> But, then i might be very wrong, perhaps *C. pepo* is much more
>>>> harsh-rigid-prickly than i am thinking of.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> surajit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Surajit ji
>>>>> If this particular plant is at a place where you can follow it up, you
>>>>> may be able to solve the mystery. Your photograph 312 does not show any
>>>>> foliaceous calyx lobes, but 336 shows clearly foliaceous. Are they are 
>>>>> from
>>>>> the same vine?, if not keep track of them. Your image 323 shows the 
>>>>> swollen
>>>>> tip of peduncle slightly separated from fruit base as also shown on page 
>>>>> 53
>>>>> of my book. This is one aspect you can perhaps sort out before next
>>>>> printing of my book. I have depicted both types of fruits in my book. Two
>>>>> things that kept me away from Cucucurbita pepo are first leaves not lobed
>>>>> (All plants of C. pepo I have seen in California including Zucchini which
>>>>> is now grown in India have deeply lobed leaves). Besides Book    Vegetable
>>>>> Crops by Balakrishnan mentions only chapan kadu as member of C. pepo
>>>>> cultivated in India.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps you have a very challenging assignment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:56 AM, surajit koley <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Good morning Sir
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attaching photographs male & female flower, fruit, leaves, sepals,
>>>>>> petiole, peduncle/pedicel. Leaf stalk is prickly, petiole sometimes 
>>>>>> longer
>>>>>> than lamina. Petiole odorous but not intense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:26 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sir,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am attaching records from Dr. Prain, Dr. Haines, FBI & FI. It is
>>>>>>> interesting to not that while Dr. Haines thinks *C. melopepo* L. is
>>>>>>> synonymous with *C. pepo* DC, Dr, Prain & Dr. Hooker think
>>>>>>> otherwise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The leaves (not photographed yet) of this plant are harsh, and the
>>>>>>> entire plant is somewhat prickly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *C. pepo* DC
>>>>>>> *C. pepo* Willd. iv. 609 *C. moshcata* Duchesne
>>>>>>> *C. melopepo.* Willd. iv. 610. *C. maxima* Duchesne Prain
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rigid, pungent hairs on the beneath of petiole; leaves deeply five
>>>>>>> lobed;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> calyx lobes narrow subulate leaf stalk hairy all over, but not
>>>>>>> pungent or rigid hair;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> calyx lobes broad spathulate, leafy
>>>>>>>  leaf stalk hairy all over, but not pungent or rigid hair;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> calyx lobes narrow-subulate Haines leaves harsh, rigid, acute lobed;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> peduncles sulcate;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> corolla narrowed at base, with erect lobes leaves soft, indumentum
>>>>>>> fine & soft;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> peduncle pentagonal,
>>>>>>> expanded below the fruit;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sepals often foliaceous leaves harsh, rigid, rounded lobed;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> peduncle not sulcate;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> corolla lobes curved outwards FBI prickly rigid hair on the beneath
>>>>>>> of the petiole;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> peduncle woody, strongly grooved;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hairs of the petiole not pungent;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> calyx segments spathulate or foliaceous hairs of the petiole not
>>>>>>> pungent;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> peduncle stout corky, striated, not grooved;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> calyx segments lanceolate-linear FI fruit sub-cylindric, both ends
>>>>>>> obtuse, suface very even fruit roundish, smooth, torulose
>>>>>>> -----------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is very confusing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Gurcharan Singh 
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Surajit ji
>>>>>>>> This fruit had confused me a lot, initially I had also thought it
>>>>>>>> to be C. pepo, but after I saw some older fruits, I noticed features 
>>>>>>>> of C.
>>>>>>>> moschata.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:33 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This one is growing on the roof of our storeroom. It seems to be
>>>>>>>>> the *Cucurbita pepo
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/mQuQIkIuzns>*,
>>>>>>>>> but is it *C. pepo* L.?
>>>>>>>>> Both in "Bengal Plants" and in Flora of British India it had been
>>>>>>>>> cited as *C. pepo* DC.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to