I paste a couple of links for more reading/viewing for my own reference -

   - http://www.scielo.br/img/revistas/abb/v27n3/a12fig01-5.jpg
   - source of above
   
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0102-33062013000300012&script=sci_arttext
   - *caroliniana* -
   http://www.juno.dti.ne.jp/~skknari/Commelina%20.caroliniana%202012..html
   - related - https://ww1.fukuoka-edu.ac.jp/~fukuhara/keitai/tsuyukusa.html


Thank you
Regards
(simply) surajit koley
! no "Sir", no "Dr.", no "Ji" !


On 4 October 2015 at 19:17, surajit koley <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Regarding flower size, whatever Haines might have recorded in his book
> BoBO, there is no question of confusing *Commelina longifolia* Lam. with *C.
> diffusa* Burm.f. (or that with *C. hasskarlii* C. B. Clarke / *C.
> caroliniana* Walter).
>
> *C. longifolia* Lam. has the largest flower and equal petals I have ever
> seen.
>
> The confusion is between *C. hasskarlii* C. B. Clarke (synonymous with *C.
> caroliniana* Walter) and *C. diffusa* Burm. f. and the discussion is open
> in https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/aulqw5hOoZk/C02DimNGFwAJ.
>
> I think my pond species is *C. caroliniana* Walter (syn. *C. hasskarlii* C.B.
> Clarke), for its less or no falcate spathe.
>
> Thank you
> Regards
> (simply) surajit koley
> ! no "Sir", no "Dr.", no "Ji" !
>
>
> On 4 October 2015 at 13:55, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Forwarding again for any assistance in the matter please.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: surajit koley <[email protected]>
>> Date: 20 September 2015 at 00:12
>> Subject: [efloraofindia:232188] Re: sk2015sept02/02 - BSI checklist of
>> Commelina
>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> This is what Lamarck noted on *C. longifolia* -
>> http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/33349848#page/155/mode/1up. BSI
>> informs the species is distributed in Peninsular, E & NE India. Isn't it
>> surprising that till to date we have no representative in our database?
>>
>> This is the only species I have ever come across which has larger flowers
>> then the rest. I was very confused when Mayur Ji and Manudev Ji identified
>> two of my threads, featuring this large flower, as *C. diffusa* Burm f.
>> More so, because earlier Mayur Ji identified a smaller flower (where petals
>> are not equal) a species as *C. diffusa* Burm.. f.
>>
>> I have Mayur Ji's paper on *C. beddomei* and Manudev Ji's paper on *C.
>> andamanica* with me. So. I still feel shaky while writing this.
>>
>> I came to know that *C. coelestis* Willd. looks similar in another
>> thread, but differs in some respect -
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/RaAjZgNORCA/74FO9kxJeTAJ.
>>
>> Even the Bangladesh doc i uploaded in one of my recent threads is
>> confusing!
>>
>> With so many pseudobotanists (me too!) playing in the net there are only
>> two pics of *C. longifolia* -
>>
>>    - https://www.flickr.com/photos/haile/2384267981
>>    - https://www.flickr.com/photos/haile/2385099498
>>
>> Where is Roxburgh's *C. salicifolia*, I thought!
>>
>> As for *C. hasskarlii* C.B. Clarke, the docs and the links I shared in
>> another my recent thread will tell that it is exceedingly similar to *C.
>> diffusa* Burm. f. The description in efloras would tell the flowers are
>> of the size of *C. benghalensis*.
>>
>> BSi informs *C. hasskarlii* is distributed throughout our country yet we
>> do not have it in our database!!!
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>> Regards
>> surajit koley
>> a *non-botanist* member of
>> efloraofIndia google group
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:26 PM, surajit koley <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I am very surprised that why both FBI and BoBo recorded flowers of *C.
>>> salicifolia* Roxb. are small while Roxburgh himslef noted flowers are
>>> large and petals are equal..!
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Regards
>>> surajit koley
>>> a *non-botanist* member of
>>> efloraofIndia google group
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:41 PM, surajit koley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is no particular species photographs. It's an introduction to my
>>>> next couple of threads.
>>>>
>>>> We have BSI checklist of the genus now -
>>>> http://efloraindia.nic.in/efloraindia/speciesList_PCL.action?resultType=genusWise&parent_Id=2431&parent_Name=commelina
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Interestingly, *Commelina diffusa* Burm. f. likely not to be found in
>>>> our area. This is because Hooghly district (South of West Bengal) doesn't
>>>> fall under the BSI specified regional distribution of the species
>>>> http://efloraindia.nic.in/efloraindia/speciesDesc_PCL.action?species_id=2483
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Yet, Sir Prain thought it was distributed in the western & northern
>>>> provinces of then Bengal. Haines also recorded the same in his book BoBO.
>>>> lease check the attached literature.
>>>>
>>>> So, I keep the species, *C. diffusa* Burm.f. in my following table -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> speciesdistributionleavesspatheflower1C. diffusa Burm, f.Peninsular,
>>>> NE & NW India, E Himalaya, Andaman & Nicobarlanceolate, 1.5-3 x
>>>> 0.33-0.67 inch, ciliate0.67-1 inch, acute, base rounded or cordate,
>>>> striate
>>>>
>>>> Haines = 0.75-2 inchsmaller petals blue, outer pale or white
>>>>
>>>> Haines = flower blue 0.5 inch diam2C. longifolia Lam. = C. salicifolia
>>>> Roxb.Peninsular, E, NE Indialinear lanceolate, 3-6 x 0.16-0.5 inch,
>>>> nearly glabrous, sheaths ciliolate1.5-2 inch, axillary, solitary,
>>>> acute to acuminate, base roundedsmall, dark blue
>>>>
>>>> Haines = smaller than diffusa3C. hasskarlii C.B.Cl 
>>>> <http://c.b.cl/>.throughout
>>>> Indianarrowly lanceolate, 1-3 x 0.5-0.67 inch, subacute to obtuse,
>>>> sheaths short0.5-1 inch, axillary, base rounded, longer than peduncle,
>>>> 4C. attenuata Koen. ex vahlalmost throughout Indialinear or
>>>> lanceolate, 1-2 (3 Haines) x 0.25-0.5 inch, obtuse or sub-acute0.33-1.5
>>>> inch, acute or caudate-acuminate, longer than peduncles, base auricled,
>>>> deeply cordatesmall, blue
>>>>
>>>> Haines = very small, brownish sepal5C. apendiculata C.B.Cl
>>>> <http://c.b.cl/>.E, NE India, E Himalayalinear or linear-lanceolate,
>>>> 4-6 x 0.17-0.67 inch, narrowed at both ends,very long peduncled, 2-3
>>>> inch, caudate-acuminate, base cordate
>>>> 6C. benghalensis L.throughout India
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 7C. maculata Edgwe. = C. obliqua Buch-Ham. ex D. Don = C. paludosa 
>>>> Bl.throughout
>>>> Indialanceolate, 4-7 x 1-2 inch, acute or caudate-acuminate,0.75-1.5
>>>> inch, usually in terminal heads, solitary or crowded, funnel shapedblue
>>>> 8C. suffruticosa Bl.C, N, E & NE Indialanceolate, 3-14 x 0.75-2 inch,
>>>> acuminate, sheaths auricled0.33-0.5 inch, panicled or clustered
>>>>
>>>> Haines = spathe funnel shaped
>>>> 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *C. tuberosa* L. also likely to be found in our region as per BSI. But
>>>> that species is different than the usual ones I see around. So, I left the
>>>> 9th space of my table blank.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>> Regards
>>>> surajit koley
>>>> a *non-botanist* member of
>>>> efloraofIndia google group
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "efloraofindia" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With regards,
>> J.M.Garg
>>
>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
>> The whole world uses my Image Resource
>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
>> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
>> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
>> per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
>>
>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
>> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
>> world- more than 2500 members & 2,25,000 messages on 18.6.15) or 
>> Efloraofindia
>> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
>> database of more than 11,000 species & 2,00,000 images). Winner of
>> Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.
>>
>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
>> India'.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to