I am pointing out that Hook.f., Fl. Brit. India 1: 682. 1875 treated S. laurifolius as a synonym of S. trifoliatus L. but some authors think that S. trifoliatus in the sense of J.D.Hooker is a mixture and a part of it goes to S. laurifolius. This problem needs to be clarified.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Anurag N. Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > Family: Sapindaceae > Date: 15th November 2015 > Place: Agumbe, Shimoga District, Karnataka > Habit: Tree > Habitat: Semi-evergreen forest > > Fruits are available at this link > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/indiantreepix/ANFEB23$20Sapindus$20trifoliatus/indiantreepix/mghn1XUGBBM/1U0ib0ACnocJ>. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
