Thank you sir. On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am pointing out that Hook.f., Fl. Brit. India 1: 682. 1875 treated S. > laurifolius as a synonym of S. trifoliatus L. but some authors think that > S. trifoliatus in the sense of J.D.Hooker is a mixture and a part of it > goes to S. laurifolius. This problem needs to be clarified. > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Anurag N. Sharma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Family: Sapindaceae >> Date: 15th November 2015 >> Place: Agumbe, Shimoga District, Karnataka >> Habit: Tree >> Habitat: Semi-evergreen forest >> >> Fruits are available at this link >> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/indiantreepix/ANFEB23$20Sapindus$20trifoliatus/indiantreepix/mghn1XUGBBM/1U0ib0ACnocJ>. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- Anurag N. Sharma BSc. (CBZ) 3rd Year St. Josephs College Bangalore -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
