I was basing my previous comments upon Stewart and a much poorer understanding of the genus. As this specimen has only just come into flower and one cannot see its typical growth habit, no fruits, barely discernible calyces (though they have spreading hairs), it may well still turn out to be *M.asiatica* but *M.sylvatica* should be considered. *Would need better images of flowers (esp. calyces) and ideally fruit to be more sure.*
On Monday, June 20, 2011 at 6:55:58 AM UTC+1, raj wrote: > Dear friends, > > ID requested for a small shrub photographed at Gulmarg. Flower size 8 to > 10 mm. > > -- > With Regards, > Narendra Joshi > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
