Thanks, Chadwell ji. On 22 Oct 2016 12:57 am, "[email protected]" < [email protected]> wrote:
> I was basing my previous comments upon Stewart and a much poorer > understanding of the genus. As this specimen has only just come into > flower and one cannot > see its typical growth habit, no fruits, barely discernible calyces > (though they have spreading hairs), it may well still turn out to be > *M.asiatica* but *M.sylvatica* should be considered. *Would need better > images of flowers (esp. calyces) and ideally fruit to be more sure.* > > On Monday, June 20, 2011 at 6:55:58 AM UTC+1, raj wrote: > >> Dear friends, >> >> ID requested for a small shrub photographed at Gulmarg. Flower size 8 to >> 10 mm. >> >> -- >> With Regards, >> Narendra Joshi >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
