Thanks, Chadwell ji On 22 Oct 2016 7:11 am, "[email protected]" < [email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, this plant comes within *Clematis connata* (there is a 'connate' > base, though not as pronounced as in some variants). Definitely not > *C.buchananiana*. > > *Please can someone send in some fresh images of this species or look > amongst their past photos to see if they have the real thing.* > > On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 2:41:27 PM UTC, ashwini wrote: > >> This climber with fragrant cream colour flowers is quite common here. I >> found one still in flower today and brought it home to have a closer look. >> I have always assumed it to be *C. connata* but after studying my sample >> today think it to be *C. buchananiana*. The flowers are ribbed and so >> are the stalks. Flowers, filaments and stalks are hairy. Please advise. >> >> Clematis buchananiana—Fragrant Chinese Clematis >> Near Dal Lake, Dharamshala Cantt. HP >> 1800m >> 17 January 2016. >> >> Thanks. >> Ashwini >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
