Thank you. On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:07 AM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, Chadwell ji > > On 4 Nov 2016 4:09 am, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> May I repeat a plea to take not just images of 'flowers' but also the >> foliage, as this can make a big difference in tracking down the identity of >> a plant. >> Please do not just take 1-3 photos of the flowers even if they are quite >> good close-ups but also habitat, habit and foliage (both upper and basal, >> ideally with >> the undersides of the leaves shown as well). >> >> Having said that. These do appear to be a Plantago. Not many are >> recorded for Nepal. Of those P.erosa is the only one with records from >> lower elevations - down >> to 900m (through to 4100m). All the specimens thought to be P.major from >> Nepal have turned out to be P.erosa. *So it does seem likely that this >> is the species photographed.* >> >> >> On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 4:41:45 PM UTC, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: >> >>> Dear Members, >>> >>> Sharing some pictures I guess is >>> *Plantago erosa* Wall. >>> >>> Shot at Kurintar, Nepal on 12 April 2012 at 1000 ft. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
