Dear All
The images from Paddar Valley are of Rhodiola heterodonta and not 
R.bupleuroides.
May I start be repeating that Rhodiola is an extremely difficult genus 
identification-wise.  Misidentificationsoccur frequently.  The situation is 
complicated by a lot of pressed specimens in the past being of poor 
qualitywhich were badly pressed.  If one attempts to dry Crassulaceae in a 
normal way compared with specimensbelonging to other families, the results can 
be poor, with all the leaves falling off!
I am making an effort with the Rhodiola genus in the NW Himalaya but am still 
not certain about a number of species  -so cannot yet undertake a full 
appraisal of all posting on efi.  Hopefully, shall be able to do so at some 
stage in the futureas the situation is in need of improvement.
Given the poor reference specimens (inadequate) in most Indian herbaria (and 
some other herbaria around the world)it is hardly surprising that something of 
a muddle exists.
With the advent of good compact digital cameras, provided those taking pictures 
in the coming years operate in a methodicalway and take 10-20 images of each 
specimen from which they can select the best/most informative 6-10 to post, our 
understandingof this troublesome genus can greatly improve.  So please take 
more images of Rhodiolas in the Himalaya from 2017 onwardsbut please, not just 
1 or 2 general shots not showing close-up detail.
As with pressed specimens for herbaria if scrappy specimens are collected in 
the first place and then one is faced with poorquality reference specimens in 
herbaria, the muddle will continue.  We need more and better close-up images of 
ALL speciesof Rhodiola in India (and other genera in the Crassulaceae family).
I have seen a number of false claims of Rhodiola bupleuroides from Kashmir and 
Himachal Pradesh - yet it is only recorded from West Nepal Eastwards!  
The images taken by Suresh match R.heterodonta - please note the second image 
illustrates that the stamens are longer than the petals (which when this 
characteristic is visible) is one of the features which distinguish it from 
R.bupleuroides (not that I am familiar with this species).
Stewart (1972) recorded R.heterodonta from 2400-5000m in Kashmir incl. Ladakh.  
I have seen it in Ladakh & Lahoul. Stewart knew it as Sedum roseum var. 
heterodontum.
R,bupleuroides is recorded in 'Flora of Lahaul-Spiti' as rare in rock crevices 
at Jispa.  I have not seen the voucher specimen but I suspect it to be a 
misidentification.
The situation is complicated by misidentified images available on the internet 
of both live plants in the wild and cultivation and pressed specimens.
Please note that the following link referred to is a complete mix-up as the 
specimen show from Bhutan (as it correctly says on the label) is of a Phlomis 
which belongs to the Lamiaceae family and looks nothing like Crassulaceae! see: 
http://www.tropicos.org/Image/100177639
As for another link: http://www.tropicos.org/Name/8903316?tab=images.   These 
show quite a number of images of mostly poor pressed specimens - have only 
glanced at them but they show more than one species of Rhodiola!
I am not impressed with this tropicos site - do not know who is responsible for 
it or the misidentifications!
Given how difficult the genus is, such completely unscientific contributions 
will only increase the muddle!!





Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk





      From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
 To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> 
Cc: Suresh Kumar Rana <[email protected]>
 Sent: Sunday, 6 November 2016, 6:18
 Subject: Fwd: [efloraofindia:135919] Rhodiola heterodonta from Paddar valley 
J&K
   
It appears closer to Rhodiola bupleuroides as per the 
following:http://www.tropicos.org/Image/17648http://www.tropicos.org/Image/100177639http://www.tropicos.org/Name/8903316?tab=imageshttp://www.asianflora.com/Crassulaceae/Rhodiola-bupleuroides.htmhttp://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=88995&flora_id=800http://www.biora.ru/modules.php?name=invitro&file=spec1&sid=19701&gid=202&fid=178



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Suresh Kumar Rana <[email protected]>
Date: 22 October 2012 at 23:24
Subject: [efloraofindia:135919] Rhodiola heterodonta from Paddar valley J&K
To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>


Request for ID confirmation
Kindly confirm this IdBot. name: Rhodiola heterodontaFamily: 
CrassulaceaeLocation: Paddar valley J&KAltitude: 3100 metersDate: 17th May 2012 
and 9th June 2011

-- 
Warm regardsSuresh Rana
-- 
 
 
 



-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg'Creating awareness of IndianFlora & Fauna'Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow 
Awards 2014 for efloraofindia. 
For identification,learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please 
visit/ joinour EfloraofindiaGoogle e-group (largestin the world- around 2700 
members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) orEfloraofindia website (with a species 
database of more than11,000 species & 2,20,000 images). The whole world uses my 
Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of 
Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can 
also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each 
image.Also author of 'APhotoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of 
India'. 

   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to