Chadwell ji, Thanks for pointing out the mess. Indeed, the plant on FOI should be Rhodiola wallichiana. Sedum oreades should look like this: http://www.plantphoto.cn/tu/1334578 I will make the correction on FOI. Cheers! Tabish
------------------------------------------- <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net The waterhole of flower lovers On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Chadwell ji > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "C CHADWELL" <[email protected]> > Date: 6 Nov 2016 11:13 pm > Subject: Sedum oreades - what a muddle! > To: "J.M. Garg" <[email protected]> > Cc: > > The image on the FOI site has been misidentified - it is a Rhodiola - > nothing like Sedum oreades > see: http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Mountain%20Sedum.html > > The first 4 google images for Sedum oreades on 'The Plant List' site are > incorrect - the line drawing > from Harvard is OK! > > Two of the images are by a Dr B.Singh from VOF. > > *No wonder people are confused. There is a specimen collected by Hooker > in Sikkim on the Kew site* > *but such low resolution as to being virtually of no use - and few can > relate to shrivelled up Crassulaceae* > specimens. > > > Best Wishes, > > > Chris Chadwell > > > 81 Parlaunt Road > SLOUGH > SL3 8BE > UK > > www.shpa.org.uk > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
