Thanks, Chadwell ji

On 24 Nov 2016 1:35 am, "C CHADWELL" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> All I can say with confidence is that the images were not of Sedum oreades.
>
> Rhodiolas and Sedum are really troublesome.   It will be a while before I
> am in a position to
> comment further about most other Rhodiolas but am working on it.  Needs
> time, concentration
> and reflection - no purpose in rushing to make claims I cannot
> substantiate/support and thus
> contributing further to the difficulties.
>
>
> Best Wishes,
>
>
> Chris Chadwell
>
>
> 81 Parlaunt Road
> SLOUGH
> SL3 8BE
> UK
>
> www.shpa.org.uk
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Tabish <[email protected]>
> *To:* J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* efloraofindia <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 8 November 2016, 8:42
> *Subject:* Re: Sedum oreades - what a muddle!
>
> Chadwell ji,
>    Thanks for pointing out the mess. Indeed, the plant on FOI should be
> Rhodiola wallichiana. Sedum oreades should look like this:
>   http://www.plantphoto.cn/tu/1334578
> I will make the correction on FOI.
>   Cheers!
>   Tabish
>
> -------------------------------------------
> <http://www.flowersofindia.net/>www.flowersofindia.net
> The waterhole of flower lovers
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Chadwell ji
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "C CHADWELL" <chrischadwell261@btinternet. com
> <[email protected]>>
> Date: 6 Nov 2016 11:13 pm
> Subject: Sedum oreades - what a muddle!
> To: "J.M. Garg" <[email protected]>
> Cc:
>
> The image on the FOI site has been misidentified - it is a Rhodiola -
> nothing like Sedum oreades
> see: http://www.flowersofindia.net/ catalog/slides/Mountain%20Sedu m.html
> <http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Mountain%20Sedum.html>
>
> The first 4 google images for Sedum oreades on 'The Plant List' site are
> incorrect - the line drawing
> from Harvard is OK!
>
> Two of the images are by a Dr B.Singh from VOF.
>
> *No wonder people are confused.  There is a specimen collected by Hooker
> in Sikkim on the Kew site*
> *but such low resolution as to being virtually of no use - and few can
> relate to shrivelled up Crassulaceae*
> specimens.
>
>
> Best Wishes,
>
>
> Chris Chadwell
>
>
> 81 Parlaunt Road
> SLOUGH
> SL3 8BE
> UK
>
> www.shpa.org.uk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to