I can only share what is within COTONEASTERS by Fryer & Hylmo.
Inevitably, there will be differences of taxonomic opinion/treatment.  My 
presentunderstanding is that Fryer & Hylmo have the most expertise.  I cannot 
judge, not beinga Cotoneaster specialist (though have field experience of quite 
a number of species) nortaxonomist how reliable Fryer's research is.
According to the book, Cotoneaster integerrimus Medikus is found in Central 
Europe andbelongs to Series Cotoneaster.  A collection was made in Slovakia in 
1990.
The only synonym given for C.humilis Dunn is C.gilgitensis G.Klotz - it belongs 
to Section Acuminati. 

Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk





      From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
 To: C CHADWELL <[email protected]> 
Cc: efloraofindia <[email protected]>; D.S Rawat 
<[email protected]>
 Sent: Wednesday, 16 November 2016, 5:19
 Subject: Re: Cotoneasters 1: Cotoneaster humilis
   
Thanks, Chadwell ji.I don't know if it's correct or not, Catalogue of Life 
gives it as a syn. of Cotoneaster integerrimus Medik., while as per The Plant 
List Ver. 1.1, it is unresolved.May be you can better clarify. 
On 4 November 2016 at 19:49, C CHADWELL <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Mr Garg
Here with my first (of many) offerings of Cotoneaster and my first posting of 
my own images.
Hope members will not be too overwhelmed by the 11 images etc. but hopefully 
this will inspirethe serious photographers amongst them to get snapping more 
images from 2017 onwards andrecognise the value of additional images covering 
habitat, habit and close-ups.  Would be good to haveimages of the flowers 
added. 
A ruler in some of the images is useful for many genera including Cotoneaster 
as exact dimensions can be of significancetaxonomically - a ruler would have 
helped with the images of the Delphinium we are currently looking at.
Not all rulers will come out well on photos (this was 'borrowed' from my 
youngest son) and it is easy to leavethem behind in the field, so carry a 
couple of spares during each trip (cannot always purchase replacements when 
inremote valleys).
My entry to accompanying the images attached below is as follows:
Cotoneaster humilis Dunn. (syn. C.gilgitensis G. Klotz) recorded from Pakistan, 
Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand.  The type specimen was collected by 
Dr R Stewart from near Sonamarg in 1921 - the holotype is at Kew; whilst the 
isotype is at Dehra Dun.
Stewart (1972) recorded this from Sonamarg & Pahlgam plus the ascent from 
Deosai to Burzil in Pakistan @ 3-4000m. 
This is not currently an accepted name in 'The Plant List' but Fryer & Hylmo 
are revising the genus.
The images were taken by myself in October in the lower Miyah Nullah, Lahoul, 
Himachal Pradesh.

Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk





      From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
 To: C CHADWELL <chrischadwell261@btinternet. com> 
 Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016, 4:20
 Subject: Re: Cotoneasters
  
Thanks, Chadwell ji.
If you post your images, it will be wonderful.
On 4 Nov 2016 12:39 am, "C CHADWELL" <chrischadwell261@btinternet. com> wrote:

Dear Mr Garg
As I have begun the major task of improving the accuracy, reliability & 
coverage of Cotoneasterson your site and it is likely to be some weeks (at the 
very least) before Jeanette Fryer will be able torespond as to the 
determinations of images I shall be sending on a CD, might I encourage 
thingsfurther by sending some images of species she has already named?   This 
may get others to sendin (and in future years, take more photos of this 
neglected genus).
Must emphasise that one needs to examine Cotoneasters carefully as on 2 or 3 
occasions there have been2 different species growing amongst each other!
I was sent a few images of 2 species by the late Krishan Lal which she named as 
C.duthieanus andC.ludlowii he had photographed in HP - the first he thought was 
C.acuminatus.
I am sure Krishan would be happy for them to be utilised on your site but does 
it seem appropriate to contacthis family to get formal permission or not 
necessary?   Krishan sent quite a lot of images to me, some of othergenera may 
well be worth sending for use in the future.
I also have images available of several species from HP and Nepal - most of 
which you do not have.   There arequite a number of species in the genus. Some 
of my images I will need to search for.

Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk






   



-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg'Creating awareness of IndianFlora & Fauna'Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow 
Awards 2014 for efloraofindia. 
For identification,learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please 
visit/ joinour EfloraofindiaGoogle e-group (largestin the world- around 2700 
members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) orEfloraofindia website (with a species 
database of more than11,000 species & 2,20,000 images). The whole world uses my 
Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of 
Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can 
also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each 
image.Also author of 'APhotoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of 
India'. 

   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to