Dear Dr Singh
Thanks for drawing my attention to this.  However, in light of Geranium 
lambertii not being known from Kashmir by Stewart (or indeedNW of Kumaon at 
that time) and Nasir being sceptical about single collection reported in Swat 
(Pakistan) - he had not seen the specimen tocomment further, 
caution/uncertainty about provisional identifications of this species from a 
small number of photos only (not showing full characteristics) seems reasonable 
to me.
As for the paper 'An Assessment of Diversity Geranium.... in India with Special 
Emphasis on Indian Himalayan Region' (2015), the authors themselves, who with 
all due respect are not specialists in the genus and relied solely on what 
literature was available to them.  They personally are unlikely to have much 
familiarity with the genus in the wild, many herbaria or cultivation.  They did 
not consult Peter Yeo (thought as he passed away some years back that was not 
possible but it is highly unlikely that they would have done so, even if he had 
still been alive). It is fair to say that it has been to the disadvantage of 
Indian botany that contact and collaboration with Western botanists (or 
Japanese ones - who have done a lot of worthwhile joint projects in Nepal) and 
plant specialists has been discouraged at a senior level for decades,
Returning to the authors of the 'Assessment', they correctly state in the 
'Conclusions' that there is much confusion in identification especially of 
perennial forms which are often considered difficult of discrimination.  They 
emphasise that the genus needs a revisionary study to comprehensively explore 
the genus in India and to review existing collection of the herbaria in light 
of current taxonomic researches.  The present study is a prelude for further 
investigation on Indian Geranium.
I note e.g. their first entry of Geranium clarkei named by Yeo (not known to 
Stewart or Nasir) yet they give no synoymns or indicate which species in 
Kashmir, G.clarkei was previously understood to be.
Yes, they give in a rather odd sequence of distribution of this species: 
Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim then Kashmir (within Indian territory) 
for Geranium lambertii yet on what basis, given it was not previously known in 
Kashmir or HP?  Where are the herbarium specimens which have been determined as 
this species?  Surely, when it is claimed that a species has been found in a 
region it was not known from before, strong evidence is required to support the 
claim.
Otherwise, how can such extensions to ranges be checked?   I have just posted a 
set of images of what I consider to be Geranium lambertii in cultivation on 
eFI.  This allows others to inspect them (if they disagree, they can say why) 
and comment enabling a meaningful comparison with specimens from Kashmir, HP 
and Uttarakhand considered to be this species.
Too often, identifications of Himalayan flora are based upon comparison between 
scrappy newly (i.e. in the past few decades) gathered pressed specimens (with 
few, if any field notes  - at time no voucher specimens at all) with often 
scrappy, poorly pressed, badly preserved, 19th Century reference specimens or 
by 'matching' with brief guides such as 'Flowers of the Himalaya' (this is not 
a Flora and covers only a fraction of the total flora of the region) which has 
at best, single small images and summarised descriptions.   Quickly 'matching' 
with such guides alone is not a reliable method of plant identification and 
whilst can result in reliable identifications for distinctive species but often 
misidentifications.   I find that most Westerners visiting the Himalaya and 
Indian botanists use 'Flowers of the Himalaya' poorly.  Few seem to have 
actually read the written descriptions nor checked altitudinal nor geographic 
distributions to see if their highly provisional identification tallies - if 
not, it should be checked further.......  
I hope, if an Indian botanist undertakes a revisionary study of Geranium they 
do not rely too heavily on just herbarium specimens (many of which were 
collected in the 19th century) in Indian herbaria.  Extensive field-work needs 
to be undertaken and greater collaboration with foreign botanists, especially 
if specialists in the genera being studied exist and plant 
enthusiasts/horticulturalists and specialist gardeners along with specialist 
horticultural societies in the West. For genera which have ornamental merit 
there may well be expertise about them in cultivation in the West such was the 
case for Peter Yeo at Cambridge University.  As far as I know he seldom (if 
ever) visited the Himalaya himself (though corresponded with others, like 
myself, who had) so his prime source of information were plants in cultivation 
(along with pressed specimens in UK and European herbaria he inspected).   I 
know of expertise (and publications) on quite a number of genera 
well-represented in the Himalaya - though some of the experts have now passed 
away.  I realise, as with professional botanists, not everyone is willing to 
help but for those who were, it is such a pity that their expertise was not put 
to good use by Indian botanists in the past.
I remain doubtful that the geraniums named as G.lambertii from Kashmir are this 
species.


Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk





      From: Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
 To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> 
Cc: C CHADWELL <[email protected]>; efloraofindia 
<[email protected]>
 Sent: Tuesday, 22 November 2016, 4:55
 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:257156] Re: Balsaminaceae, Geraniaceae and 
Oxalidaceae Week: Geraniaceae-Geranium lambertii from Kashmir-GS-20
   
Distribution: India (Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim,Kashmir) Nepal, 
Bhutan, Tibet.Pl see paper on diversity Geranium published in 2015Wagh et al., 
J Biodivers Manage Forestry 2015, 4:2http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2327-417.1000140
Dr. Gurcharan SinghRetired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ 
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ 

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:13 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks, Chadwell ji
On 20 Nov 2016 1:22 am, "chrischadwell261@btinternet. com" 
<chrischadwell261@btinternet. com> wrote:

I am uncertain what this is.  It does not match well my understanding of what 
G.lambertii is plus there are no records of this species for Kashmir.  Shall 
look into this further - there are several species of Geranium in Kashmir and 
bordering areas I am unfamiliar with.  This specimen from Aphawat could be one 
of these.  Plus there is the possibility of new species of this genus from this 
area - some new ones have been recognised in past decades.
I consider it will be helpfulfor keen photographers, willing to make an 
additional effort, to knowwhich parts of Geranium to photograph.  Having images 
of such parts ofeach geranium will greatly aid identification and enhance our 
understanding ofthe genus in the Himalaya - and perhaps you can help with the 
locating andidentification of a species new-to-science!  PHOTOGRAPHING 
GERANIUMS: IF only the firstone or two flowers have come out don't bother to 
collect as the form ofinflorescence will not be evident.
The rootstock is important; get enough to showwhether compact or creeping, or 
annual.  You can photograph the base ofthe plant which should provide this 
information.  Clearly, one requirespermission from the authorities to uproot a 
plant.  There is still  a need and indeed role for the collection ofpressed 
specimens for herbaria in India but that is primarily the domain ofstaff of 
botanic gardens/ institutions.
 
 In the early stages of flowering look out forthe best-developed unripe fruits 
available.
 
 If fruit is ripe try to include both dehiscedand undehisced states.
 
 If the fruits are falling with the seedsinside them, collect some (many 
geraniums disperse their seed explosively butsome seed is often retained).
 
Include some loose petals whenpressing (detach if necessary).  Expose stamens 
to show filament shape andhairs by taking 2 or 3 sepals off a flower from which 
petals have recently dropped.
 
Smoothing out one or two leaves andflowers as you close the press may be 
helpful; a few separately pressed basaland lower/middle stem leaves are often 
useful.
 
Wilted specimens can be verymisleading.
 
Notes should be taken as to flowerposture, colour and patterning of petals, 
colour of stigmas, anthers and distalparts of filaments (not necessary if your 
photos show these).
 
And don't forget to ensure thestipules are clearly shown - something that would 
have been obviously inpressed specimens, so not mentioned above by Yeo.

On Saturday, March 9, 2013 at 7:42:28 AM UTC, Gurcharan Singh wrote:
Geranium lambertii Sweet, Geraniaceae. 4: t. 338. 1827.Syn: Geranium 
grevilleanum Wall.
Perennial herb with thick short vertical rootstock; branches trailing or 
ascending, up to 50 cm tall; Leaves opposite, stipules broadly lanceolate, 
free, 8-13 mm long, upper narrower; leaf blade 5-angled, 5-7-lobed to about 
middle, 6-8 cm broad, with rhomboid-cuneate lobes, appressed-hairy; flowers 
pale pink, rose-coloured or white,25-35 mm across,in 2-flowered cluster on up 
to 16 cm long peduncle covered with spreading hairs; pedicel up to 5 cm long; 
sepals elliptic-ovate, 8-14 mm long, mucro 1.5-2 mm long; petals 15-22 mm long, 
hairy at base, tip rounded or depressed; filaments lanceolate, hairy outside, 
anthers black; mericarps smooth, beak ap to 3 cm long.
Photographed from Apharwat Kashmir. The leaves resemble G. wallichianum but 
stipules are much narrow and free and petals rose to white. 
-- 
Dr. Gurcharan SinghRetired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089http://www.gurcharanfamily.comhttp://people.du.ac.in/~singhg 45/ 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@goog legroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected] .
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/grou p/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op tout.





   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to