Thanks, Chadwell ji

On 24 Nov 2016 10:38 pm, "C CHADWELL" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks but the main issue is what species this geranium is.  I remain
> uncertain.
>
> Are you familiar with Geranium kashmirianum?  In another post I have
> requested a description of this (and ideally
> images) and how this is distinguished from other geraniums in Kashmir?
>
> Are you familiar with G.kishtvariense and how this is distinguished from
> other geraniums in Kashmir.
>
> Are you familiar with G.swatense and how it is disntiguished from other
> geraniums.
>
> Until I am comfortable recognising all the geraniums recorded from
> Kashmir, shall struggle to be sure of images posted and
> whether many represent a taxon not previously recorded.
>
> As it now appears that what was G.pratense in Kashmir is now G.clarkei?
> What about Geranium collinum?
>
> Are you familiar with G.himalayense?  Are you familiar with G.regelii?
>
> *I would welcome seeing any geraniums you have photographed in the NW
> Himalaya.*
>
>
> Best Wishes,
>
>
> Chris Chadwell
>
>
> 81 Parlaunt Road
> SLOUGH
> SL3 8BE
> UK
>
> www.shpa.org.uk
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
> *To:* J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* C CHADWELL <[email protected]>; efloraofindia <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 22 November 2016, 4:38
> *Subject:* Re: [efloraofindia:257113] Re: Balsaminaceae, Geraniaceae and
> Oxalidaceae Week: Geraniaceae-Geranium collinum from Kashmir-GS-19
>
> Thanks a lot Dr. Chadwell for your very critical analysis. I assure you
> all images are from the same plant, I have even checked time of
> photography. Why it looks different to you I think is because it shows
> upper view of flowers, others lower view.
>    I have cropped original image 1 to show stipules and bracts, and
> similar from G. wallichianum. You may compare to see clear differences.
>    To me G. wallichianum is a very distinct species, not to be easily
> confused with others.
>
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:38 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Chadwell ji
>
> On 19 Nov 2016 6:28 pm, "chrischadwell261@btinternet. com
> <[email protected]>" <chrischadwell261@btinternet. com
> <[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> *I currently cannot put a firm name on this - shall comment further in due
> course, though is often difficult with so little information to go on when
> only a small number of photos are taken.  KINDLY NOTE THAT THE 4TH IMAGE
> DOES NOT TALLY WITH THE FIRST THREE (assuming the third image does
> represent the lower leaves of the first two) - the flower looks like a
> variant of Geranium wallichianum to me.  This species has widely-varying
> flower colour.  There is a form in cultivation in the UK known as 'Buxton's
> Variety (sometimes but incorrectly, as 'Buxton's Blue).  A colleague of
> mine came across a variant similar to this on the Rohtang in 1989.
> G.wallichianum is recorded from up to 3300m, so may well be found on
> Khelanmarg (albeit towards its upper limit altitude-wise).  The stipules
> are not shown in any of the photos, which in the case of G.wallichianum are
> usually diagnostic.  It is not unknown to have more than one species of
> Geranium growing near to each other/amongst each other, meaning care needs
> to be taken to distinguish between them.  *
>
> *Given that geraniums readily hybridise in cultivation one has to wonder
> about the possibility of hybrids when two geranium species meet in the
> wild?  I have yet to see the possibility of hybrids mentioned in any
> postings on eFI in relation to possible identification of any genera (nor
> apomictic genera like Taraxacum).  True, it is often hard enough to try and
> recognise which species a specimen belongs to, let alone consider hybrids!*
>
> Further to my recent post about photographing Geraniums.  I am far from
> certain that the true Geranium collinum is found in the Himalaya. This is a
> complicated matter.  Let me try to explain. It has certainly been thought
> to in the past. Stewart e.g. listed this species from the Khardong La in
> his 'The Flora of Ladakh' (1916-17) - I have not seen the pressed specimen
> but from the altitude and location, I would think this is probably what I
> understand to be G.regelii.  He also listed G.grandiflorum (which is now
> Geranium himalayense).  The images above do not come close to my
> understanding of either of these species - nor G,.pratense subsp.
> stewartianum a specimen of which I saw near Sonamarg which Peter Yeo at
> Cambridge identified as this in 1987.  Dickore & Klimes (2005) which is the
> most up-to-date checklist for Ladakh do not include G.collinum only G.
> himalayense, pratense, regelii and sibiricum.
>
> In 'The Valley of Flowers' G.pratense, collinum, wallichianum and
> grevilleanum (now G.lambertii) are listed.
>
> In the Notes Yeo supplied me, he draws attention to the problematical
> G.collinum-pratense-himalayens e alliance.  He considered this was
> particularly critical in the NW Himalaya with high quality pressed
> specimens needed (nowadays these can be supplemented and sometimes replaced
> by high quality digital images (provided the advice given below is
> followed).  This alliance has pink to blue flowers (sometimes white) in
> which the stamen-tip and stigmas are never blackish-purple...
>
>
> I consider it will be helpful for keen photographers, willing to make an
> additional effort, to know which parts of Geranium to photograph.  Having
> images of such parts of each geranium will greatly aid identification and
> enhance our understanding of the genus in the Himalaya - and perhaps you
> can help with the locating and identification of a species new-to-science!
>
>
> PHOTOGRAPHING GERANIUMS:
>
> *IF only the first one or two flowers have come out don't bother to
> collect as the form of inflorescence will not be evident.*
>
> *The rootstock is important; get enough to show whether compact or
> creeping, or annual.  You can photograph the base of the plant which should
> provide this information.  Clearly, one requires permission from the
> authorities to uproot a plant.  There is still  a need and indeed role for
> the collection of pressed specimens for herbaria in India but that is
> primarily the domain of staff of botanic gardens/ institutions.*
>
> * In the early stages of flowering look out for the best-developed unripe
> fruits available.*
>
> * If fruit is ripe try to include both dehisced and undehisced states.*
>
> * If the fruits are falling with the seeds inside them, collect some (many
> geraniums disperse their seed explosively but some seed is often retained).*
>
> *Include some loose petals when pressing (detach if necessary).  Expose
> stamens to show filament shape and hairs by taking 2 or 3 sepals off a
> flower from which petals have recently dropped.*
>
> *Smoothing out one or two leaves and flowers as you close the press may be
> helpful; a few separately pressed basal and lower/middle stem leaves are
> often useful.*
>
> *Wilted specimens can be very misleading.*
>
> *Notes should be taken as to flower posture, colour and patterning of
> petals, colour of stigmas, anthers and distal parts of filaments (not
> necessary if your photos show these).*
>
> *And don't forget to ensure the stipules are clearly shown - something
> that would have been obviously in pressed specimens, so not mentioned above
> by Yeo.*
>
>
>
> On Saturday, March 9, 2013 at 3:56:25 AM UTC, Gurcharan Singh wrote:
>
> Posting again as I missed proper subject line in earlier post
>
> *Geranium collinum* Steph. ex Willd., Sp. Pl. 3:705. 1800.
>
> Perennial herb up to 80 cm tall with elongated horizontal rhizome, stems
> ascending to erect with retrorse hairs and some spreading glandular hairs;
> stipules lanceolate, 6-8 mm long; leaves opposite, petiole up to 12 cm long
> in lower leaves, upper shorter; blade rounded, 2-8 cm broad,5-7 lobed to
> about middle, segments wedge-shaped  further 3-5-lobed; flowers 25-30 mm
> across, lilac to lilac-purple, usually in 2-flowered cluster on up to 15 cm
> long ascending to recurved peduncle; pedicel up to 5 cm long; bracteoles
> linear-lanceolate; sepals 5-9 mm long, elliptic-oblong, with 1-2 mm long
> mucro, pubescent; petals 12-18 mm long, obovate, rounded to retuse at tip;
> filaments triangular and hairy at base; mericarps pubescent, with up to 2.5
> cm long beak.
>
> Photographed from Khillenmarg, Kashmir, about 3000 m altitude
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com / <http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/>
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg 45/ <http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@goog legroups.com
> <[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/grou p/indiantreepix
> <https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op tout
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to