Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji. On 12 Jan 2017 1:17 a.m., "[email protected]" < [email protected]> wrote:
> These images present difficulties identification-wise. They are > inadequate. PLEASE on future occasions, take MANY MORE images including > both > upper and lower surfaces of flowers, upper & lower foliage (both upper and > lower surfaces), habitat and habit. > > I find it hard to speculate which species it belongs to. I am in > agreement it does not fit with Clematis and does appear to be an Anemone. > Could be > a straggly Anemone rivularis or an elongated version of another species > but even IF I was more confident, I cannot see that these images represent a > useful reference - just add to the confusion which exists already. > > Cannot justify devoting any more time on these images. > > On Sunday, October 25, 2009 at 9:28:59 AM UTC, Nudrat Sayed wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This particular plant was seen at a height of 2100 mtrs at a place >> called Triund. The flowers were abt 2 cms across and the plant was abt >> 1foot in height. Please help in identifying it. >> -- >> Regards >> Dr. Sayed Nudrat Zawar >> Senior Conservation Officer >> Conservation Action Trust Mumbai >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
