Dear Shrikant The stipules which I tried to photograph in this second set look exactly as if it is a miniature leaf; like a half of a heart shape...?auricle or ear shape? and not linear lanceolate as you say so? Do we have both the plants on Vetal Tekdi? We can check it again. Satish Phadke
On 27 April 2010 09:33, shrikant ingalhalikar <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Satish Phadke, > > G. tiliifolia is a larger tree with smaller leaves compared to G. > asiatica. Your second set of pictures show G. asiatica twig because > the stipules are linear-lanceolate, they are not leafy and auricled. > Perhaps pics of G. tiliifolia stipules will sort the issue. Regards, > Shrikant > > On Apr 26, 10:49 pm, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry again. > > My interpretation seems to be exactly opposite. Is the plant depicted in > the > > picture *G tiliifolia* then? Can somebody please elaborate? > > BSI Mah flora also says they are foliaceous in G.tiliifolia. > > > > On 26 April 2010 23:12, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for sending bigger size image. > > > > > On 26 April 2010 23:10, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Pursuing the search about the differentiating characters I checked for > the > > >> stipules of the plant today. They are foliaceous in G.asiatica which > is > > >> clearly seen in the attached picture while they are linear lanceolate > in > > >> G.tiliifolia. > > >> Attaching some pictures showing it and part of the key from Cooke's > flora. > > >> My earlier pictures do not show them clearly. > > >> I would like to request Prashant ji to show some picture of > G.tiliifolia > > >> with stipules if he has any such picture in his collection. > > >> The glands near the petals are difficult to recognise from the > available > > >> pictures. > > >> Regards > > >> Dr Phadke Satish > > > > >> On 15 April 2010 20:33, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >>> This small tree is also flowering on Vetal Tekdi(Pune) at present. > > >>> I hope the ID is correct. There are many plants in the area some are > 6 > > >>> feet while the largest are 12-15 feet high or even may be larger. > > >>> I was told this same tree by different IDs by many including some > > >>> botanists,often as Grewia tilifolia and Grewia asiatica. > > >>> Requesting for correct ID(Of course if possible by looking at the > visible > > >>> characters in the picture) > > >>> Leaf size biggest noted is 18-20cm. Flower size 1 cm. > > >>> Dr Phadke Satish > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
