Agree with Radha ji. The long, prominent pedicels in these photographs are indicative of *Anagallis pumila* Sw. [*Primulaceae*]. In contrast, the flowers of *A. minima* are sessile/subsessile with the pedicels either absent or almost inconspicuous (c. 1 mm).
Best wishes, Viplav El jue., 20 sept. 2018 a las 14:37, radha veach (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Longer pedicels, not petioles. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
