Thanks a lot, Radha ji and Viplav ji

On Thu 20 Sep, 2018, 3:29 PM [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Agree with Radha ji. The long, prominent pedicels in these photographs are
> indicative of *Anagallis pumila* Sw. [*Primulaceae*]. In contrast, the
> flowers of *A. minima* are sessile/subsessile with the pedicels either
> absent or almost inconspicuous (c. 1 mm).
>
> Best wishes, Viplav
>
> El jue., 20 sept. 2018 a las 14:37, radha veach (<[email protected]>)
> escribió:
>
>>  Longer pedicels, not petioles.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "efloraofindia" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to