Thanks, Tabish ji.
I think you are right.
I checked in GBIF for specimens from India
<https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?country=IN&taxon_key=5338199> and
it seems to be correct as per Specimen from Manipur
<https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid%2FL.2966399%2Fformat%2Flarge>.

Looks different from *Uncaria sessilifructus *Roxb.
<https://www.gbif.org/species/5338285> as per GBIF
<https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?country=IN&taxon_key=5338285>-
specimen
<https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nhm.ac.uk%2Fservices%2Fmedia-store%2Fasset%2F1f26beb02153945a9d3992845eba950bd2fbfe6d%2Fcontents%2Fpreview>
in India,

On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 at 20:57, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes Garg ji,
>  I have been doing that. One feature I want to point out is that in the
> attached illustration of *Uncaria sessilifructus* I have marked some
> objects by red - they are bracts I guess. These are seen in the drawings at
> FOC and also in all herbarium images of *Uncaria sessilifructus* that I
> have seen. These objects are missing in the plant whose images I posted.
> These objects are also not there in the herbarium image of *Uncaria
> laevigata* at POWO.
>   Leaf undersides don't appear glaucous, in the attached closeup of leaves.
>    Tabish
> -------------------------------------------
> www.flowersofindia.net
> The waterhole of flower lovers <http://www.flowersofindia.net>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 12:50 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Tabish ji,
>> Two species appears rather close as per keys from Flora of China
>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=134135>:
>> 9 (8)
>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=134135#KEY-1-8> 
>> Leaf
>> blade not glaucous abaxially, with tertiary venation mostly reticulate and
>> not strongly scalariform on adaxial surface; peduncles simple; corolla
>> lobes externally glabrous; fruit 6-8 mm.   3 *U. laevigata*
>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242353405>
>> + Leaf blade often glaucous abaxially, with tertiary venation rather
>> evidently scalariform at least on adaxial surface; peduncles simple or
>> often branched; corolla lobes externally sericeous; fruit 10-14 mm.   10 *U.
>> sessilifructus*
>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200022243>You
>> have to examine closely these with the original images, to come to the
>> conclusion.
>>
>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 18:32, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I still think it is *Uncaria laevigata, *although I am not able to say
>>> it with full confidence. The details of the flowers agree with the images
>>> here:
>>>
>>> http://www.qsbg.org/Database/plantdb/herbarium/herbarium-specimen.asp?qsbgno=35035
>>> Inflorescence and leaf underside do not appear to agree well with
>>> * Uncaria sessilifructus
>>> <http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:768311-1>  *
>>> The hooked thorns in this genus are generally paired in most species.
>>> However, in my plant they don't seem to be paired. In the herbarium image 
>>> of*
>>> Uncaria laevigata
>>> <http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:768268-1>*
>>> at POWO
>>> <http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:768268-1>,
>>> also don't seem to be paired. However, I could not find mention of the
>>> nature of thorns in the description at Flora of China. In many images of U.
>>> laevigata on GBIF too, I find unpaired thorns. Don't know if it is a
>>> feature of this species or a coincidence.
>>> My plant doesn't agree well with the illustration of Uncaria scandens
>>> here:
>>> http://www.plantillustrations.org/illustration.php?id_illustration=10875
>>>    Any more inputs will be welcome.
>>>    Tabish
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *-------------------------------------------www.flowersofindia.net
>>> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>The waterhole of flower lovers
>>> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 5:13 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]
>>> <[email protected]>> wrote:Hi, Tabish ji,So what is it finally ?Also check
>>> Uncaria scandens (Sm.) Hutch.
>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/r/rubiaceae/uncaria/uncaria-scandens>
>>>  On
>>> Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 23:44, Tabish <[email protected] <[email protected]>>
>>> wrote:Uncaria sessilifructus is reported from
>>> Manipur. 
>>> http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:768311-1
>>> <http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:768311-1>
>>>  Tabish-------------------------------------------www.flowersofindia.net
>>> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>The waterhole of flower lovers
>>> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:40 PM Nidhan Singh
>>> <[email protected] <[email protected]>> wrote:It is Uncaria
>>> sp.My post from Gori Valley was identified as Uncaria
>>> sessilifructus..Thanks -- You received this message because you are
>>> subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To
>>> unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/szhbstN6E2A/unsubscribe
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/szhbstN6E2A/unsubscribe>.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected]
>>> <[email protected]>. To view this discussion on
>>> the web, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAE%3DTH0AehBaz%2B9%3DV5TUvt%3D8Jv%2BD7cC7tTPEB-eMayqt6t-TNoA%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAE%3DTH0AehBaz%2B9%3DV5TUvt%3D8Jv%2BD7cC7tTPEB-eMayqt6t-TNoA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop
>>> receiving emails from it, send an email to
>>> [email protected]
>>> <[email protected]>. To view this discussion on
>>> the web, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CALTV20eyAG6Rx--HiB73WCRzFRt%2BcdvMejVWVoe_-yzBogNVKw%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CALTV20eyAG6Rx--HiB73WCRzFRt%2BcdvMejVWVoe_-yzBogNVKw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>> -- With regards,J.M.Garg *
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *-- With regards,J.M.Garg *
>
>



*-- With regards,J.M.Garg *

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFCVSN7_fH90h5AGm_%2B2hn8t%2B%2B9wM2t%3DeYQVK5hsUejdQA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to