Yes Garg ji and Saroj ji. I have been forwarding only those posts which have already been displayed on our website. We should rather identify and remove such (incomplete or blurred) images from our website, and allow them to remain only in email threads. It should be our priority to identify and remove such images, so that they don't come up in Google search. As I have already written in another thread any wrongly identified images (even if there is ? mark after the name) gets prominently displayed and consequently highlighted in Google search image display. If they are only in email threads they won't come up in Google (or any other) search.
Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Mob: 9810359089 https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 2:53 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with you. > Our focus should be on identifying posts which have enough details for > identification and not leaving any stone unturned in identifying difficult > and new plants. > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Sun, 10 Jan, 2021, 11:43 am Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear members, >> >> I guess we are wasting our time in trying to ID old posts with >> single image which are blurred, >> out of focus and leaves only and without proper guidelines like >> date/elevation/location. Old posts >> with multiple images sounds good for trying to ID. This is my personal >> opinion. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHiXKpWW_FcxrmJ6i%3DwQ4Wen69iEiWJiOLB2KO1T2T9%3D3fnO%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
