I am rather happy to see that several now active experts like Paradesi ji, Chennuru ji, Radha ji, Mahadeswara ji are helping us to identify several long pending posts, with Saroj ji devoting his whole time to the noble cause.
Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Mob: 9810359089 https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:25 PM Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Garg ji and Saroj ji > Let us do what we can do. My main focus is to see that the number of > unidentified and doubtful identifications are reduced so that they don't > stand out as odds. You may or may not realise but when you search a > particular taxon in image search and out or several thumbnails one stands > out, and it is a real embarrassment at least for me, if I discover that > this odd image is located in efloraofindia. I want to minimise that > situation. > > > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Mob: 9810359089 > https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:11 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, Singh ji, >> Just any image appearing on google image search does not mean that it is >> from that species. When we see an image in google search image, it leads to >> the page where its status is shown. >> Lots of gems are hidden as unidentified- does not mean that we should >> delete them. Our policy is to keep all discussions on our website (since >> its inception), by properly displaying them under correct heading, as far >> as possible within our limited resources. >> >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 21:46, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yes Garg ji and Saroj ji. >>> I have been forwarding only those posts which have already been >>> displayed on our website. We should rather identify and remove such >>> (incomplete or blurred) images from our website, and allow them to remain >>> only in email threads. It should be our priority to identify and remove >>> such images, so that they don't come up in Google search. As I have already >>> written in another thread any wrongly identified images (even if there is ? >>> mark after the name) gets prominently displayed and consequently >>> highlighted in Google search image display. If they are only in email >>> threads they won't come up in Google (or any other) search. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>> Retired Associate Professor >>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>> Mob: 9810359089 >>> https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 2:53 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree with you. >>>> Our focus should be on identifying posts which have enough details for >>>> identification and not leaving any stone unturned in identifying difficult >>>> and new plants. >>>> -- >>>> With regards, >>>> J. M. Garg >>>> >>>> On Sun, 10 Jan, 2021, 11:43 am Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear members, >>>>> >>>>> I guess we are wasting our time in trying to ID old posts with >>>>> single image which are blurred, >>>>> out of focus and leaves only and without proper guidelines like >>>>> date/elevation/location. Old posts >>>>> with multiple images sounds good for trying to ID. This is my personal >>>>> opinion. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHiXKpUNP2%3DMdMYZmRdAVz5kf9jEJnb%2BfFYn-KE2-J9_qOiSvA%40mail.gmail.com.
