Most likely this is not *Youngia japonica* (L.) DC. This is something else.
The species features upto 20 florets per capitulum, check FoC, and other uploads, not all, in eFI. The question is how many more florets can anyone allow for the identification of *Youngia japonica* (L.) DC.? On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 at 20:59, surajit koley <[email protected]> wrote: > This is most probably *Youngia japonica* (L.) DC. Usually, outer > phyllaries are apparently smaller than those can be seen in ths picture > set, ut instances are there, with a little larger outer phyllaries - > https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/youngia-japonica/. > Please, check both, FoC, and FoNA, along with other literatures. > > Another species with similar outer phyllaries, but with glandular hairs is > *Pterotheca > falconeri* Hook.f. (check eFI). > > I would like to add that , as per description available, *Launaea > microcephala* Hook.f. also has ".... 2-seriate involucral bracts, 6-8 i > number, outer minute, inner linear. Radical leaves obovate-spathulate, > cauline ......." > > > Thank you > With regards > surajit koley > > > On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 at 10:54, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> This is no *Launaea acaulis*, neither any usual *Launaea* spp. Here the >> phyllaries are 2-seriate, each set having phyllary of equal size, I am yet >> to find that character in *Launaea*. >> >> Unfortunately, there is no herbarium of *L. microcephala*, neither any >> description except in Flora of British India ( same point admitted in one >> 2002 Pakistan paper (on *Launaea*). In spite of that it has no chance of >> being *L. microcephala*, neither flowering stem is filiform, nor >> peduncle is capillary. >> >> FBI has no *Taraxacum* that matches with this one. >> >> I am yet to know what this species might be. >> >> Thank you >> Regrads >> surajit koley >> >> >> On Wednesday, 16 June 2021 at 12:18:48 UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: >> >>> Any opinion on my earlier suggestion : Launaea acaulis (Hook.fil.) >>> Babc. ex Kerr <https://www.gbif.org/species/3144813>. ?? >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 9:53 PM Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Forwarding for Id >>>> Distributed as Launaea species- enroute to Ghanghariya from Gobind Ghat >>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/ar/asteraceae/cichorioideae/cichorieae/launaea/launaea-species/to-ghanghariya-from-gobind-ghat> >>>> At that altitude most likely species with slightly spiny margined >>>> leaves and solitary heads seems to be L. polyclada >>>> Group discussion at >>>> Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea? from VOF for id >>>> -NS 14 (google.com) >>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/AWEQwe-Yk0w> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 10:49:32 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J. M. Garg >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec, 2020, 2:09 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Launaea acaulis (Roxb.) Babc. ex Kerr ?? >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 7:17:59 PM UTC+5:45 D.S Rawat wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I too have this species with me; pics and specimen. Like to know ID. >>>>>>> DSRawat Pantnagar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sunday, July 14, 2013 7:23:58 AM UTC+5:30, Nidhan Singh wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear All, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This composite was found growing along the route leading to >>>>>>>> Ghanghariya from Gobind Ghat..looks similar to *T**araxacum >>>>>>>> officinale*..but the leaves differ..can this be any *Launaea*..please >>>>>>>> help to id.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dr. Nidhan Singh >>>>>>>> Assistant Professor >>>>>>>> Department of Botany >>>>>>>> I.B. (PG) College >>>>>>>> Panipat-132103 Haryana >>>>>>>> Ph.: 09416371227 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> >>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/bc7f0f24-7e28-45f8-9479-9b1dd364ccf9n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/bc7f0f24-7e28-45f8-9479-9b1dd364ccf9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> >>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/06b72895-a5a2-4ccd-a9b0-aaa9d411ea54n%40googlegroups.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/06b72895-a5a2-4ccd-a9b0-aaa9d411ea54n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/AWEQwe-Yk0w/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/70b2919f-6800-4acf-bb98-88e3e3a47e1an%40googlegroups.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/70b2919f-6800-4acf-bb98-88e3e3a47e1an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAMV_mc0f3KBK1uO_285jauRX_8KqUM4T65%3DbZ_HMZVxiJN63GQ%40mail.gmail.com.
