On going through the following pages, I found: *GBIF*: *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) Huth* <https://www.gbif.org/species/7587087> as "ACCEPTED" and *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) Millsp.* <https://www.gbif.org/species/2960383> as "DOUBTFUL" *POWO*: Cajanus cajan *(L.) Huth* <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:1152177-2> *IPNI*: Cajanus cajan *(L.) Huth* <https://www.ipni.org/n/1152177-2> ... here, *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) Millsp.* and *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) Druce* are mentioned as *isonyms*.
Thus, I am taking *Cajanus cajan (L.) Huth* as heading for compilation of vernacular names. Thanks once again, Saroj ji and Garg ji. Regards. Dinesh On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:48 AM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: > OK Dinesh Ji ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 9:17 AM Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thank you very very much, Saroj ji and Garg ji. >> I will go with *Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.* as per IPNI >> <https://www.ipni.org/n/1006709-2>. >> Regards. >> Dinesh >> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 6:10 AM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It is better to follow IPNI when in doubt. >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J. M. Garg >>> >>> On Thu, 23 Dec, 2021, 12:20 am Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> https://www.ipni.org/n/1006709-2 >>>> If we follow CoL, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. should be the >>>> accepted name ! >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:48 PM Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear friends, >>>>> I was about to compile names of the species *Cajanus cajan*, when I >>>>> stumbled across pages for each of these taxons - *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) >>>>> Millsp.* AND *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) Huth* at POWO and GBIF, and >>>>> perhaps they are listed similarly in other taxonomical sites. At >>>>> Wikipedia, >>>>> there is *Cajanus cajan* (L.) Millsp. ... at eFI, we have *Cajanus >>>>> cajan* (L.) Huth ... at FoI, we have *Cajanus cajan* (L.) Millsp. >>>>> >>>>> There may be some reason why both taxa are listed as accepted names; >>>>> but I think they both are pointing to the same popular plant that is >>>>> cultivated world-over. Please help me know which one is to be considered >>>>> as >>>>> heading for compiling its names in Indian languages. In my notes, I have >>>>> been using *Cajanus cajan* (L.) Millsp. >>>>> >>>>> Regards. >>>>> Dinesh >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC2SkGOh-sNUxt2z9wFTA70NwgMJYEz0Pgt1OJNCg3YU7w%40mail.gmail.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC2SkGOh-sNUxt2z9wFTA70NwgMJYEz0Pgt1OJNCg3YU7w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC3t7AeGiqTZthcCb4vwWd6N7p%3DSjJqt9WDT0LB0BcHZZQ%40mail.gmail.com.
