Dinesh ji, when dealing with accepted names we have to follow nomenclature rules Earliest name for the plant is Cytisus cajan Linn., 1753 Since this species was later transferred to genus Cajanus, we have to follow earliest valid combination We have these *Cajanus cajan* (L.) Huth, Helios 11: 133 (1893). <https://www.ipni.org/n/1152177-2> *Cajanus cajan* (L.) Millsp., Publ. Field Columb. Mus., Bot. Ser. 2(1): 53 (1900). <https://www.ipni.org/n/1006709-2> *Cajanus cajan* (L.) Druce, Rep. Bot. Soc. Exch. Club Brit. Isles 4(Suppl. 2): 611 (1917). <https://www.ipni.org/n/482992-1>
Obviously Cajanus cajanus (L.) Huth is the accepted name If you Google search, you will find most recent publications following this. On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 11:33:01 AM UTC+5:30 Dinesh Valke wrote: > On going through the following pages, I found: > *GBIF*: *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) Huth* <https://www.gbif.org/species/7587087> > as "ACCEPTED" and *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) Millsp.* > <https://www.gbif.org/species/2960383> as "DOUBTFUL" > *POWO*: Cajanus cajan *(L.) Huth* > <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:1152177-2> > *IPNI*: Cajanus cajan *(L.) Huth* <https://www.ipni.org/n/1152177-2> ... > here, *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) Millsp.* and *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) Druce* are > mentioned as *isonyms*. > > Thus, I am taking *Cajanus cajan (L.) Huth* as heading for compilation of > vernacular names. > > Thanks once again, Saroj ji and Garg ji. > > Regards. > Dinesh > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:48 AM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OK Dinesh Ji ! >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 9:17 AM Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thank you very very much, Saroj ji and Garg ji. >>> I will go with *Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.* as per IPNI >>> <https://www.ipni.org/n/1006709-2>. >>> Regards. >>> Dinesh >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 6:10 AM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It is better to follow IPNI when in doubt. >>>> -- >>>> With regards, >>>> J. M. Garg >>>> >>>> On Thu, 23 Dec, 2021, 12:20 am Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://www.ipni.org/n/1006709-2 >>>>> If we follow CoL, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. should be the >>>>> accepted name ! >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:48 PM Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear friends, >>>>>> I was about to compile names of the species *Cajanus cajan*, when I >>>>>> stumbled across pages for each of these taxons - *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) >>>>>> Millsp.* AND *Cajanus cajan* *(L.) Huth* at POWO and GBIF, and >>>>>> perhaps they are listed similarly in other taxonomical sites. At >>>>>> Wikipedia, >>>>>> there is *Cajanus cajan* (L.) Millsp. ... at eFI, we have *Cajanus >>>>>> cajan* (L.) Huth ... at FoI, we have *Cajanus cajan* (L.) Millsp. >>>>>> >>>>>> There may be some reason why both taxa are listed as accepted names; >>>>>> but I think they both are pointing to the same popular plant that is >>>>>> cultivated world-over. Please help me know which one is to be considered >>>>>> as >>>>>> heading for compiling its names in Indian languages. In my notes, I have >>>>>> been using *Cajanus cajan* (L.) Millsp. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards. >>>>>> Dinesh >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC2SkGOh-sNUxt2z9wFTA70NwgMJYEz0Pgt1OJNCg3YU7w%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC2SkGOh-sNUxt2z9wFTA70NwgMJYEz0Pgt1OJNCg3YU7w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/09f78f15-e023-4ff2-b507-f876f3d336b6n%40googlegroups.com.
