Thanks a lot, Tapas ji, for the clarification.

--
With regards,
J. M. Garg

On Sat, 8 Jan, 2022, 3:05 am Tapas Chakrabarty, <[email protected]> wrote:

> *Acacia intsia *or *Senegalia intsia *is a *nomen confusum. *Dr. Bruce
> Maslin, in a personal communication finally also agreed to my arguments. I
> take this plant as *Senegalia caesia.*
> Thank you.
> Tapas.
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:46 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From the earlier books both appear to be same as per books:
>> Forest Plants of Eastern India - Page 225
>> <https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Forest_Plants_of_Eastern_India/RQ-tItJSi60C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=acacia+intsia+%2B+acacia+caesia&pg=PA225&printsec=frontcover>
>>
>> Mansfeld's Encyclopedia of Agricultural and Horticultural ... - Page 600
>> <https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Mansfeld_s_Encyclopedia_of_Agricultural/10IMFSavIMsC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=acacia+intsia+%2B+acacia+caesia&pg=PA600&printsec=frontcover>
>>
>> Indian Medicinal Plants: A Compendium of 500 Species
>> <https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Indian_Medicinal_Plants/Rk_vt0KqzMEC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=acacia+intsia+%2B+acacia+caesia&pg=PA17&printsec=frontcover>
>>
>> It appears there was some taxonomic confusion somewhere.
>> But without keys and clear cut differences, it may be difficult to reach
>> some conclusions.
>> So until then let us keep it at Senegalia caesia
>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2013/09/19/acacia-caesia/>, like other
>> observations.
>>
>> On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 at 19:52, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 12:50, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, Mahadeswara ji,
>>>> Did you check with the descriptions?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 at 17:53, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>> From: M Swamy <[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 at 17:16
>>>>> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:409720] Fwd: Swamy/New series/ID/49 -
>>>>> climber for ID.
>>>>> To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Many many thanks Garg ji for your clarification.  You have  made extra
>>>>> efforts  to go through in detail.  Great !  .
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Dr.M.Swamy
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 3:35 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, there seems to be some confusion. But both seem to be different
>>>>>> as per
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Senegalia intsia* (L.) Maslin, Seigler & Ebinger:
>>>>>> POWO
>>>>>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77132510-1>,
>>>>>> ILDIS <http://www.legumes-online.net/ildis/aweb/td114/td_24005.htm>,
>>>>>> FoPI
>>>>>> <http://flora-peninsula-indica.ces.iisc.ac.in/herbsheet.php?id=5944&cat=7>,
>>>>>> CoL
>>>>>> <http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019/details/species/id/0a17bcc6cea3d5bab103669a25e117a2/synonym/f56cb9f6b9b76077886ff924391b5eb7>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Senegalia caesia* (L.) Maslin, Seigler & Ebinger
>>>>>> POWO
>>>>>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77132504-1>
>>>>>> , ILDIS <http://www.legumes-online.net/ildis/aweb/td079/td_16743.htm>
>>>>>> , FoPI
>>>>>> <http://flora-peninsula-indica.ces.iisc.ac.in/herbsheet.php?id=5923&cat=7>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I could not find the keys between the two. Pl. check with
>>>>>> descriptions give in FoPI at links above.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 17:40, M Swamy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am reforwarding  with the proper ID number.  My previous posting
>>>>>>> on this plant carried a same number given to another plant (*Dombeya
>>>>>>> spectabilis ).  *That is why I am reforwarding with the proper ID
>>>>>>> reference number.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear members,
>>>>>>> I am forwarding  h/w the  photos received from  Chennai  for ID.
>>>>>>> This is a  liana,   in a farm, entangling trees in a  vicious thorny 
>>>>>>> hold.
>>>>>>> Picture of flowers not available.  Pods are  very thin and flat.
>>>>>>> There is confusion  as to whether it is *Senegalia* *caesia* (L.)
>>>>>>> Maslin et al., Blumea 58:40. 2013 (syn: (≡) *Acacia caesia*
>>>>>>> <http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?796> (L.)
>>>>>>> Willd  as in efloraofindia or *Senegalia intsia *(L.) Maslin  syn.
>>>>>>> *Acasia caesia*.   Or both the names are one and the same.  If so
>>>>>>> what is the correct citation.  Please clarify.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BNJD3MajAD27-crKbHEp0cHJAUnXHXDhTGq3%2ByOH-At5zrijQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BNJD3MajAD27-crKbHEp0cHJAUnXHXDhTGq3%2ByOH-At5zrijQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With regards,
>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> With regards,
>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With regards,
>>> J.M.Garg
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With regards,
>> J.M.Garg
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFBLAT5cFh72KdnegkWXCmMm1DY8Z2AUt94hfXRLVVFisg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to