Thank you Viplav ji for the detailed analysis.
The ID could be resolved.
Apologies for a delayed revert.

Regards
Alka Khare

On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 8:47:11 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:

> Thanks a lot, Viplav ji, for the wonderful analysis and efforts. 
>
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 20:39, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't have access to a specific key for the two species of *Benkara* under 
>> consideration here. The description of *Benkara fasciculata* by King & 
>> Gamble on the India Biodiversity Portal 
>> <https://indiabiodiversity.org/species/show/280724> is the only 
>> 'detailed' one that I could find. However, it is amply clear that the leaf 
>> shape of both the species can vary. The leaf shape of *Benkara* 
>> *malabarica* has been described variously by different authors as: 
>> "ovate, subacute at the apex, rounded at the base" (Talbot); 
>> "elliptic-oblong or oblong-lanceolate, subacute, tapering to the base" 
>> (Cooke); and "obovate to oblanceolate" (Brandis). Therefore, I doubt if the 
>> shape of the leaves can be a reliable distinguishing feature.
>>
>> Speaking of leaves, what stands out in the available descriptions is the 
>> thickness:
>>
>> *B. fasciculata*: Leaves membranous (King & Gamble);
>> *B. malabarica*: Leaves coriaceous (Talbot / Cooke / Brandis).
>>
>> I feel that the inflorescence structure in the attached image posted by 
>> Alka ji is more revealing. There is a similar image of the inflorescence of 
>> *B. 
>> malabarica* in the Auroville Virtual Herbarium 
>> <https://aurovilleherbarium.org/contents/description-flower.php?id=52>, 
>> it differs from the sparse flower clusters/fascicles of *B. fasciculata* in 
>> the eflora of India page 
>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2021/05/02/benkara-fasciculata/>. Brandis 
>> writes that the axillary fascicles of *B. fasciculata* 
>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2021/05/02/benkara-fasciculata/> are 
>> "few-flowered".
>>
>> *B. fasciculata*: Flowers axillary, in fascicles or solitary (King & 
>> Gamble); few-flowered (Brandis);
>> *B. malabarica*: Flowers in congested leaf-opposed, 
>> short-peduncled cymes (Talbot / Cooke).
>>
>> Another distinctive floral feature appears to be the size of the corolla 
>> tube in relation to the lobes.
>>
>> *B. fasciculata*: Corolla tube nearly 1 inch in length (King & Gamble);
>> *B. malabarica*: Corolla tube shorter than the lobes (Brandis); tube 
>> 0.2" long (Talbot).
>>
>> Best wishes, Viplav
>>
>> On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 at 13:38, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Viplav ji, for solving the mystery.
>>> In that case, it appears more closer to images, details and references 
>>> at Benkara fasciculata 
>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2021/05/02/benkara-fasciculata/> rather than 
>>> those at Benkara malabarica 
>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2017/08/04/benkara-malabarica/>
>>> Pl. also see leaf bases in other three images.
>>> Both are reported from Orissa as per BSI Flora of India checklist 
>>> <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/speciesList_PCL.action?resultType=genusWise&parent_Id=16285&parent_Name=benkara>
>>> .
>>> Also see POWO 
>>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77089753-1> 
>>> (Benkara fasciculata) and POWO 
>>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:912144-1> 
>>> (Benkara 
>>> malabarica)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 14:19, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> This appears to be *Benkara malabarica* (Lam.) Tirveng. [*Rubiaceae*]. 
>>>> The inflorescence structure ("in congested leaf-opposed, short 
>>>> peduncled cymes") can be seen in the third image.
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes, Viplav
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 10:31, Alka Khare <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK Garg ji.
>>>>> We take it as Catunaregam spinosa.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was referring to the leaves of this plant that I had seen in Mumbai
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Alka Khare
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, February 7, 2022 at 3:56:57 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I do not find anything more closer than Catunaregam spinosa 
>>>>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/14/catunaregam-spinosa/>
>>>>>> Flora of Pakistan 
>>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=220002468> 
>>>>>> says:
>>>>>> *Leaves opposite or fascicled on dwarf branches, obovate, 2.5–7.5 x 
>>>>>> 1.25–3.75 cm, rarely ovate or spathulate,* entire, obtuse or acute, 
>>>>>> membranous, glabrous or pubescent on both surfaces, specially on the 
>>>>>> nerves 
>>>>>> beneath; shortly petioled, petiole hairy; lateral nerves prominent. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Flora of China 
>>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=220002468> 
>>>>>> says:
>>>>>> *Petiole 2-8 mm, *pilose, pilosulous, or hirtellous to glabrous;* 
>>>>>> leaf blade drying papery or subleathery, obovate or oblong-obovate or 
>>>>>> rarely ovate to spatulate, 1.8-11 × 1-5.7 cm, *both surfaces 
>>>>>> glabrous to strigillose, strigose, hirtellous, or sparsely hirsute at 
>>>>>> least 
>>>>>> along principal veins,* base cuneate and sometimes decurrent,* 
>>>>>> margins entire or often shortly ciliate, apex acute; *secondary 
>>>>>> veins 4-7 pairs, *often with pilosulous domatia in abaxial axils; 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leaf base appears to be variable in the same image, which is creating 
>>>>>> some doubt in my mind also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Feb 2022 at 21:21, Alka Khare <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No Garg ji, there is no mix up.
>>>>>>> All pics belong to the same plant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The leaves of the plants I have seen in Maharashtra have more 
>>>>>>> pronounced veins, I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Alka Khare
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday, February 6, 2022 at 1:47:21 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Leaves appear to be OK in the 3rd image.
>>>>>>>> Pl. check. 
>>>>>>>> Is there any mix up?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 10:19, Alka Khare <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Garg ji.
>>>>>>>>> The leaves looked completely different though.
>>>>>>>>> I have seen quite a few of these trees here in Maharashtra and the 
>>>>>>>>> leaves looked different.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Alka Khare
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 1:42:05 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Pl. check with images at Catunaregam spinosa 
>>>>>>>>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/14/catunaregam-spinosa/>
>>>>>>>>>> To me appears close.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 at 17:48, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please check Randia/Himalrandia/Benkara/Caturanegam !!
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 5:27 PM Alka Khare <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello friends
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This was clicked at Satpada on the banks of the Chilika lake, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Odisha in December 2021.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Requested to please ID.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alka Khare
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/a32cf13b-9e8e-4534-b501-ec98bad3f8e9n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/a32cf13b-9e8e-4534-b501-ec98bad3f8e9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/4fee9f14-7124-4baf-b405-3ebc223afeb6n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/4fee9f14-7124-4baf-b405-3ebc223afeb6n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/58ac4400-5ec7-4368-8f76-f8a2ceb91bf0n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/58ac4400-5ec7-4368-8f76-f8a2ceb91bf0n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/837deafb-a2cd-48ca-8b8a-092e81e5beb2n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/837deafb-a2cd-48ca-8b8a-092e81e5beb2n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEBD%2BRqcPj7J-G281GYwc%2BmTBHBN4V1BFeg-O-nyMBx1%3DCv35A%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEBD%2BRqcPj7J-G281GYwc%2BmTBHBN4V1BFeg-O-nyMBx1%3DCv35A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> With regards,
>>> J.M.Garg
>>>
>>
>
> -- 
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/056068f6-d845-4681-aad2-29201caf4c90n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to