I think with insufficient details it may not be possible to get correct 
identification.I will try to get more photos of bamboos in future.regards 
Satish Nikam 


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad


On Friday, May 20, 2022, 10:18 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks a lot, Manoj ji

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Manoj Chandran
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 at 22:08
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:423027] Bamboo for identification
To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>


Yes, If those are strong spines, then it could be Bambusa bambos. But need to 
be confirmed whether they are growing buds or strong spines. But I couldn't 
find any auricles on the smaller culm sheaths at the axils. But one needs to 
check the culm sheaths on the main culm. If Dr.Satish could recall whether it 
was thorny or not. Another aspect is the glaucous nature of young shoot (bluish 
powder) which is usually found in Dendrocalamus, but there could be variations 
as well. Anyway, a photo of the whole plant and culm sheath would help confirm 
the species.
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:34 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks a lot, Pudji ji

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Pudji Widodo 
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 at 15:22
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:423027] Bamboo for identification
To: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>


Dear Garg Ji.I have asked the bamboo expert, Prof Elizabeth A Widjaja.  She 
said that the main parts for identification is the presence or absence of an 
auricle.  When she saw the spines, she thought that they were Bambusa bambos.  
But she is not sure.
Pudji Widodo
Fakultas Biologi Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
PURWOKERTO 53122 INDONESIA


On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 1:37 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks, Satish ji

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: satish nikam <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 at 12:05
Subject: [efloraofindia:423027] Bamboo for identification
To: <[email protected]>


Friends,Photos taken at Aambyvalley rd., Upper Lonavala Maharashtra in October 
21.Huge tree more than 20 ft. but was unable to capture the full tree due to 
dense vegetation.Regards Satish Nikam

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHn%3DYYbitzc6cXM420E4cchb7SkcwiOEWv82Mjz0VHyNwBf2ag%40mail.gmail.com.


-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg


-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg


-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/1537902315.729214.1653212039144%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to