Dear Tabish, Please have a look at all my posts in efi and opine
Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 12:12 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Tabish ji. > After thorough scrutiny, I agree with you. > Although the keys are correct, the distribution given is wrong in BSI > Flora of India > <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=4555&type=3>. > However, POWO > <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:234023-1> > gives the correct distribution. > Keys in Flora of China > <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=121445> are > also correct. > > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 at 18:59, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Tabish ji, you may be right in some sense. The confusion is confounded by >> Flora of British India and unfortunately BSI Flora mostly copying it >> blindly and showing distribution of both varieties of M. wightii in Tamil >> Nadu, var, wightii in Sri Lanka also. >> I think we may have several uploads of M. nepalensis from many >> parts of India. I am uploading specimens from Uttarakhand separately. >> >> >> >> >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >> Retired Associate Professor >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >> https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 2:20 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you Tabish. >>> >>> Can you please send me the link of any journal/documentation if you have >>> the access ?? >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 2:06 PM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, *Myriactis wightii *is already known from Nepal. Also, do have a >>>> look at the images of M. wightii at POWO: >>>> >>>> https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:234023-1/images >>>> There are images similar to the plants in your posts. >>>> Tabish >>>> ------------------------------------------- >>>> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net >>>> The waterhole of flower lovers >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 12:33 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> However, POWO and the GBIF show the distribution for Nepal ! >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 12:43 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In that case my posts should be addition to nepal. Please have a look >>>>>> at my posts. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/fQgYFUp6o_Q >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/1cjL8ie8NiU >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/fiotXcQ7yAU >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/cL343ekztdE >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you Tabish ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 12:52 AM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually all the images depicted on the eFI page for Myriactis >>>>>>> nepalensis >>>>>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/15/myriactis-nepalensis/> should >>>>>>> be of Myriactis wightii. If you see the description of M. >>>>>>> nepalensis on Flora of China >>>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200024319>, >>>>>>> the ray florets are much smaller than the disk florets, and are in 8-10 >>>>>>> series. The illustration on FOC page correctly depicts the species. The >>>>>>> probable culprit for this confusion are the two images linked on the FOC >>>>>>> page, which don't agree with the illustration: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=103835&flora_id=800 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=103836&flora_id=800 >>>>>>> An image of Myriactis nepalensis from the book *Flowers of the Se >>>>>>> La* by Magnus Lidén & Pankaj Bharali is attached here. >>>>>>> Tabish >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/c0f7cad1-3908-4d61-b17e-fe520a596183n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/c0f7cad1-3908-4d61-b17e-fe520a596183n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytQGoRfkqkJWXEeKPKgYGxjH_Qb27V8D4EBJOP-i5SKnog%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytQGoRfkqkJWXEeKPKgYGxjH_Qb27V8D4EBJOP-i5SKnog%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytR_L8wtC6pGRf27pkcnKWEsY2dxU%3D38K2dU7NhFvEGSTg%40mail.gmail.com.
