I think all these links are still following the old belief that there are
not two, but a single species called Spermacoce alata, with S. latifolia as
a synonym. Infact Flora of China
<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242425675>
still has that. But in the light of the paper that I sent, and the present
status in POWO, these two are distinct species.
   Tabish
-------------------------------------------
<http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net
The waterhole of flower lovers


On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 2:20 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you Tabish,
>
> May I have your opinion on the following links from the GBIF ?
> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2598659804
> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/3391668857
> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/4022360522
> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/3334637592
> Thank you.
>
> Saroj Kasaju
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 2:26 PM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes Saroj,
>>  I had forgotten to add in my post that all plants on eFI, listed under
>> Spermacoce alata,
>> should logically be taken as Spermacoce latifolia, as S. alata is
>> restricted to South America
>> but S. latifolia is naturalized in Tropical Asia and Africa.
>>   Tabish
>> -------------------------------------------
>> www.flowersofindia.net
>> The waterhole of flower lovers
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 12:42 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear Tabish,
>> >
>> > Please have a look at the links and suggest !
>> > https://efloraofindia.com/2012/08/20/spermacoce-latifolia/
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>> > Saroj Kasaju
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 11:02 AM Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks very much dear Tabish, for this notification !!!
>> >> I tried to find through my posts - as to how I deflected from
>> latifolia to alata, but I could not find it.
>> >> I will revise my notes shortly.
>> >> Regards.
>> >> Dinesh
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 10:20 AM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> In view of this paper
>> >>>
>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319131179_A_New_Weed_in_Florida_Spermacoce_latifolia_and_the_Distinction_between_S_alata_and_S_latifolia_Spermacoceae_Rubiaceae
>> >>> and updates on POWO, this plant should be Spermacoce latifolia Aubl.,
>> as originally considered by Dinesh.  Spermacoce alata is a different plant,
>> not found in India.
>> >>>   Tabish
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> >>> From: Dinesh Valke <Unknown>
>> >>> Date: Sunday, October 13, 2013 at 6:21:38 PM UTC+5:30
>> >>> Subject: Spermacoce latifolia at Pachmarhi :: 18 SEP 13 :: DV
>> >>> To: efloraofindia <Unknown>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Pachmarhi ... about 3600 feet ft asl
>> >>> Date / Time: 18 SEP 13 at 08:47 AM ... Altitude: about 3568 ft asl
>> >>> ________________________________
>> >>> Spermacoce latifolia Aubl. ... (family: Rubiaceae)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards.
>> >>> Dinesh
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to [email protected].
>> >> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC25VkEmLrvwrqNdoZ8pJF%2B6ENbBgPPmx%2Bj%3DzcGs2kR9vA%40mail.gmail.com
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CALTV20c2LrGs3%2BccWG4X_FwjTS9O1h1w%2B8g6DyHzzABYDr4ZpA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to