Yes, I guess all yo be revised including images on google.
Actually, did not find a single image of the real S. alata.
Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju


On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 2:42 PM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think all these links are still following the old belief that there are
> not two, but a single species called Spermacoce alata, with S. latifolia as
> a synonym. Infact Flora of China
> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242425675>
> still has that. But in the light of the paper that I sent, and the present
> status in POWO, these two are distinct species.
>    Tabish
> -------------------------------------------
> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net
> The waterhole of flower lovers
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 2:20 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Tabish,
>>
>> May I have your opinion on the following links from the GBIF ?
>> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2598659804
>> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/3391668857
>> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/4022360522
>> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/3334637592
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Saroj Kasaju
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 2:26 PM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes Saroj,
>>>  I had forgotten to add in my post that all plants on eFI, listed under
>>> Spermacoce alata,
>>> should logically be taken as Spermacoce latifolia, as S. alata is
>>> restricted to South America
>>> but S. latifolia is naturalized in Tropical Asia and Africa.
>>>   Tabish
>>> -------------------------------------------
>>> www.flowersofindia.net
>>> The waterhole of flower lovers
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 12:42 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Dear Tabish,
>>> >
>>> > Please have a look at the links and suggest !
>>> > https://efloraofindia.com/2012/08/20/spermacoce-latifolia/
>>> > Thank you.
>>> >
>>> > Saroj Kasaju
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 11:02 AM Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks very much dear Tabish, for this notification !!!
>>> >> I tried to find through my posts - as to how I deflected from
>>> latifolia to alata, but I could not find it.
>>> >> I will revise my notes shortly.
>>> >> Regards.
>>> >> Dinesh
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 10:20 AM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> In view of this paper
>>> >>>
>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319131179_A_New_Weed_in_Florida_Spermacoce_latifolia_and_the_Distinction_between_S_alata_and_S_latifolia_Spermacoceae_Rubiaceae
>>> >>> and updates on POWO, this plant should be Spermacoce latifolia
>>> Aubl., as originally considered by Dinesh.  Spermacoce alata is a different
>>> plant, not found in India.
>>> >>>   Tabish
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> >>> From: Dinesh Valke <Unknown>
>>> >>> Date: Sunday, October 13, 2013 at 6:21:38 PM UTC+5:30
>>> >>> Subject: Spermacoce latifolia at Pachmarhi :: 18 SEP 13 :: DV
>>> >>> To: efloraofindia <Unknown>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Pachmarhi ... about 3600 feet ft asl
>>> >>> Date / Time: 18 SEP 13 at 08:47 AM ... Altitude: about 3568 ft asl
>>> >>> ________________________________
>>> >>> Spermacoce latifolia Aubl. ... (family: Rubiaceae)
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Regards.
>>> >>> Dinesh
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>> >> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CABSQqC25VkEmLrvwrqNdoZ8pJF%2B6ENbBgPPmx%2Bj%3DzcGs2kR9vA%40mail.gmail.com
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytSkettLSema83zZDJ2Pc4kJgTpqxf_%3DFAg22zKtP_wOmQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to