Forwarded last time itself. Written to him again. On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 16:31, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the contents I have postcards should be forwarded to Mr. Wiegleb ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:27 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 13:01 >> Subject: Fwd: Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix >> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> >> Cc: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >> >> >> A comment as per Ranunculus trichophyllus subsp. trichophyllus >> <https://efloraofindia.com/2015/02/02/ranunculus-trichophyllus/>: >> "...... The plant from Dhorpata needs to be checked for R. himalaicus >> Tamura. Correct taxonomy below: >> >> Ranunculus aquatilis L., Sp. Pl.: 556 (1753). – Type from Europe >> (Netherlands or Sweden). The species is restricted to temperate Europe with >> some extensions to the southern Medterranean and West Asia. Other >> mentionings are based on misidentification. >> = Ranunculus aquaticus Neck., Delic. Gallo-Belg.: 242 (1768). -Type from >> France, may as well be regarded as orthographic variant of R. aquatilis L. >> >> Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix, Pl. Vapinc.: 31 (1785), nom. cons. prop. >> – Type from France. The species occurs in the northern hemisphere and may >> be on the Australian mainland. Other mentionings are misidentifications. >> ≡ Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix in Villars, Hist. Pl. Dauph. 1: 335 >> (1786). >> ≡ Batrachium trichophyllum (Chaix) Bosch, Prodr. Fl. Bat.: 7 (1850). – >> Batrachium is no longer being regarded a separate genus but a section of >> Ranunculus. >> = Ranunculus peucedanifolius All., Fl. Pedem. 2: 53 (1785), nom. rej. >> prop. – Type from Italy. >> = Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus Withering, Arr. Brit. Pl. ed., 3, >> 2: 507 (1796). – Type from Britain. >> – Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus sensu Whittemore et auct. amer. – >> An ambiguous taxon which contains several species, besides R. trichophyllus >> also R. longirostris Godr., R. subrigidus W.B. Drew, R. codyanus Boivin, >> and may be others. >> >> Ranunculus himalaicus Tamura, J.Geobot. 26(3), 68, 9 (1978); Rajbhabdari >> & Rai, Handb. Fl. Pl, Nepal 1: 420 (2020); Kumar Ghimire et al., Fl. >> Kailash. Sacr. Landscape Nepal 1: 259 (2021). – Type from Nepal. >> G. Wiegleb, 2024" >> >> Thanks a lot, Wiegleb ji. >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 16:00 >> Subject: Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix >> To: efloraindia <[email protected]>, J.M. Garg < >> [email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> *Dear Members,Location: Dhorpatan, Baglung, Nepal Date: 31May >> 2023Elevation: 2900 m.Habit : Wild* >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFBFxdsfeZPknTA1RxdD678fdf0rPKPMQbJ-kD5rS0HC%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
