OK Mr. Garg!
Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju


On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 7:50 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Forwarded last time itself.
> Written to him again.
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 16:31, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think the contents I have postcards should be forwarded to Mr. Wiegleb
>> !
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Saroj Kasaju
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:27 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 13:01
>>> Subject: Fwd: Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix
>>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>> A comment as per Ranunculus trichophyllus subsp. trichophyllus
>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2015/02/02/ranunculus-trichophyllus/>:
>>> "...... The plant from Dhorpata needs to be checked for R. himalaicus
>>> Tamura. Correct taxonomy below:
>>>
>>> Ranunculus aquatilis L., Sp. Pl.: 556 (1753). – Type from Europe
>>> (Netherlands or Sweden). The species is restricted to temperate Europe with
>>> some extensions to the southern Medterranean and West Asia. Other
>>> mentionings are based on misidentification.
>>> = Ranunculus aquaticus Neck., Delic. Gallo-Belg.: 242 (1768). -Type from
>>> France, may as well be regarded as orthographic variant of R. aquatilis L.
>>>
>>> Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix, Pl. Vapinc.: 31 (1785), nom. cons. prop.
>>> – Type from France. The species occurs in the northern hemisphere and may
>>> be on the Australian mainland. Other mentionings are misidentifications.
>>> ≡ Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix in Villars, Hist. Pl. Dauph. 1: 335
>>> (1786).
>>> ≡ Batrachium trichophyllum (Chaix) Bosch, Prodr. Fl. Bat.: 7 (1850). –
>>> Batrachium is no longer being regarded a separate genus but a section of
>>> Ranunculus.
>>> = Ranunculus peucedanifolius All., Fl. Pedem. 2: 53 (1785), nom. rej.
>>> prop. – Type from Italy.
>>> = Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus Withering, Arr. Brit. Pl. ed.,
>>> 3, 2: 507 (1796). – Type from Britain.
>>> – Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus sensu Whittemore et auct. amer.
>>> – An ambiguous taxon which contains several species, besides R.
>>> trichophyllus also R. longirostris Godr., R. subrigidus W.B. Drew, R.
>>> codyanus Boivin, and may be others.
>>>
>>> Ranunculus himalaicus Tamura, J.Geobot. 26(3), 68, 9 (1978); Rajbhabdari
>>> & Rai, Handb. Fl. Pl, Nepal 1: 420 (2020); Kumar Ghimire et al., Fl.
>>> Kailash. Sacr. Landscape Nepal 1: 259 (2021). – Type from Nepal.
>>> G. Wiegleb, 2024"
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot, Wiegleb ji.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 16:00
>>> Subject: Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix
>>> To: efloraindia <[email protected]>, J.M. Garg <
>>> [email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Dear Members,Location: Dhorpatan, Baglung, Nepal Date: 31May
>>> 2023Elevation: 2900 m.Habit : Wild*
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Saroj Kasaju
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With regards,
>>> J.M.Garg
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With regards,
>>> J.M.Garg
>>>
>>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytSXn%2BpAOGrjP0mMiGRU6vONNHVWH0fgsCZPfKY9y%3DTZ7A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to